You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 258 No. 23, December 18, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prevalence of Antibody to Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hepatitis B Surface Antigen in Blood Samples Submitted to a Hospital Laboratory

Implications for Handling Specimens

H. Hunter Handsfield, MD; M. Jeanne Cummings, RN; Paul D. Swenson, PhD

JAMA. 1987;258(23):3395-3397.


Abstract

The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was determined in serum or plasma specimens of 506 patients submitted to the clinical chemistry laboratory of an urban teaching hospital, and the results were correlated with "biohazard" warning labels on the specimens. Hepatitis B surface antigen, HIV antibody, or either of these were present in 32 (6.3%), 15 (3.0%), and 44 specimens (8.7%), respectively. Ten (67%) of 15 specimens with HIV antibody and nine (28%) of 32 with HBsAg bore biohazard labels. Among 473 unlabeled specimens, HIV antibody was present in five (1.1%), HBsAg was present in 23 (4.9%), and 27 (5.7%) contained either or both of these markers. All clinical and laboratory personnel should be vaccinated against hepatitis B and should handle all blood specimens as if they were infected, regardless of biohazard labeling. By fostering complacency in handling unlabeled specimens, the use of biohazard labels may paradoxically increase the risk that health care workers will be exposed to HIV and hepatitis B virus.

(JAMA 1987;258:3395-3397)



Author Affiliations

From the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health (Drs Handsfield and Swenson); Harborview Medical Center (Dr Handsfield and Ms Cummings); and the Departments of Medicine (Dr Handsfield and Ms Cummings) and Laboratory Medicine (Dr Swenson), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Harborview Medical Center ZA-89, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104 (Dr Handsfield).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

HIV Screening: Nosocomial Epidemiologic Risks and Decision Analysis
Pauker
J Law Med Ethics 1990;18:33-40.
 

The Prevelance of HIV Seropositivity and HIV-Related Illness in Washington State Prisoners
Dugdale and Peterson
The Prison Journal 1989;69:33-38.
 

The Labeling of Specimens as Infectious
Godfrey
JAMA 1988;259:1807-1807.
ABSTRACT  

Routine Preoperative Screening for HIV: Does the Risk to the Surgeon Outweigh the Risk to the Patient?
Hagen et al.
JAMA 1988;259:1357-1359.
ABSTRACT  

Research on Humans Published in JAMA
Handsfield
JAMA 1987;258:3513-3513.
ABSTRACT  

PREVALENCE OF HIV ANTIBODY IN LABORATORY SPECIMENS
JWatch General 1987;1987:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.