You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 258 No. 24, December 25, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Past, Present, and Future of Continuing Medical Education

Achievements and Opportunities, Computers and Recertification

Phil R. Manning, MD; Donald W. Petit, MD

JAMA. 1987;258(24):3542-3546.


Abstract

Changes in continuing medical education (CME) during the past three decades have been controversial and complex. A 1950s-style, small-scale, voluntary activity has evolved, in 1987, into broad-scale programs with accredited sponsors and with ties to relicensure. Within the next three decades, CME will be directed by methods chosen by specialty boards for recertification and by exploitation of computer and telecommunication technology. Written recertification examinations can waste physicians' time studying material that will not improve care of their patients. We hope improved methods of analysis of individual practices, on-the-spot access to pertinent medical information, and better communication among physicians can be incorporated into recertification procedures. Policies established now will shape CME for decades to come. We encourage a coordinated effort by medical specialty boards, medical societies, hospitals, medical schools, computer corporations, telecommunication firms, granting agencies, and the National Library of Medicine to ensure the most effective and efficient recertification and CME policies.

(JAMA 1987;258:3542-3546)



Author Affiliations

From the Postgraduate Division, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Postgraduate Division, University of Southern California School of Medicine, 1975 Zonal Ave, KAM 317, Los Angeles, CA 90033 (Dr Manning).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Continuing medical education: Quality issues in continuing medical education
Holm
BMJ 1998;316:621-624.
FULL TEXT  

An Informatics-based Chronic Disease Practice: Case Study of a 35-year Computer-based Longitudinal Record System
Nordyke and Kulikowski
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1998;5:88-103.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changing Clinical Practice: Prospective Study of the Impact of Continuing Medical Education and Quality Assurance Programs on Use of Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism
Anderson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:669-677.
ABSTRACT  

Lifelong Learning Tailored to Individual Clinical Practice
Manning and DeBakey
JAMA 1992;268:1135-1136.
ABSTRACT  

Potential Effectiveness of Comparative Casemis-corrected Adverse Outcome Rates as Quality Monitors in a Simulated Hospital System
Pine et al.
Med Decis Making 1989;9:104-115.
ABSTRACT  

Continuing Medical Education: Past, Present, and Future
Wilbur
JAMA 1987;258:3555-3556.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.