You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 258 No. 6, August 14, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Toward Optimal Laboratory Use
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

How Will Changes in Physician Payment by Medicare Influence Laboratory Testing?

JAMA. 1987;258(6):803-808.


Abstract

In-office laboratory testing offers physicians an opportunity to increase their incomes through the potential profit available from technical services. This financial incentive for in-office testing has been altered by Medicare limits on physician payment, legislative changes in physicians' ability to bill Medicare for laboratory tests, and technological advances in office laboratory equipment. While restrictions on payment may make laboratory testing relatively less profitable than other technical services offered in the physician's office, in-office laboratory testing still offers potential financial benefit to physicians, particularly if they can influence the demand for tests. Economic theory suggests that physicians may be able to increase the demand for their services, including laboratory testing, but empirical data are not conclusive. As Medicare and other third-party payers consider fundamental reform in physician payment, the effect of different payment schemes on physicians' use of laboratory tests may have important consequences for physicians' income, the quality of care, patients' access to care, and the cost of the Medicare program.

(JAMA 1987;258:803-808)



Footnotes

From the Section of General Medicine, Department of Medicine (Dr Eisenberg), and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (Drs Eisenberg and Pauly), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the United Hospital Fund, New York (Ms Myers).

This article is based on a report submitted to the Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress.

Reprint requests to Box 624, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283 (Dr Eisenberg).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.