This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (50)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Stanley Sherman, MD, FCCP; Carolyn E. Guidot, MD

JAMA. 1987;258(7):927-930.

Abstract
We reviewed 139 cases of thoracotomy for lung cancer, performed during a 7 1/2-year period. Patients were divided into two groups based on age: a younger group (<70 years old) and an elderly group (70 years old). Among all cases of lung cancer diagnosed during the study period, the percentage of patients undergoing thoracotomy in both groups was comparable. Comparison of baseline features of the two groups revealed no statistical difference in the distribution of sex, smoking history, arterial blood gas values, degree of airflow obstruction, cell type, stage of cancer, or subsequent therapy. Potentially serious medical problems were more frequent in the elderly group, whereas the younger group had significantly higher values for several pulmonary function parameters and underwent a significantly higher proportion of pneumonectomies. Although operative mortality in the elderly group was greater (9.4% vs 4.0%; 95% confidence intervals, 29.9%, 92.5% vs 7.5%, 70.1%), further analysis of outcomes revealed no statistically significant difference in the postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, or actuarial survival. We conclude that advanced age does not adversely affect prognosis following thoracotomy for lung cancer. Therefore, elderly patients with reasonable cardiopulmonary function should not be denied potentially curative pulmonary resection because of concern for age-related complications.

(JAMA 1987;258:927-930)

Author Affiliations
From the Pulmonary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich.

Footnotes
Read in part before the annual meeting of the American Thoracic Society, Kansas City, Mo, May 14, 1986.

Reprint requests to Pulmonary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, 3535 W 13 Mile Rd, Suite 502, Royal Oak, MI 48072 (Dr Sherman).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Advanced Age Is Not Correlated With Either Short-term or Long-term Postoperative Results in Lung Cancer Patients In Good Clinical Condition
Sawada et al.
Chest 2005;128:1557-1563.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequency and mortality of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome after pulmonary resection for bronchogenic carcinoma
Ruffini et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2001;20:30-37.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery
British Thoracic Society et al.
Thorax 2001;56:89-108.
FULL TEXT  

Perioperative mortality and major cardio-pulmonary complications after lung surgery for non-small cell carcinoma
Licker et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 1999;15:314-319.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

DIFFUSING CAPACITY PREDICTS OPERATIVE MORTALITY BUT NOT LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AFTER RESECTION FOR LUNG CANCER
Wang et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999;117:581-587.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thirty-day operative mortality for thoracotomy in lung cancer
Wada et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998;115:70-73.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improved Results in the Management of Surgical Candidates With Lung Cancer
Knott-Craig et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997;63:1405-1409.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative Pulmonary Evaluation
Jackson
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2120-2127.
ABSTRACT