You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 259 No. 11, March 18, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

How to evaluate a diagnostic marker test. Lessons from the rise and fall of dexamethasone suppression test

A. A. Nierenberg and A. R. Feinstein
Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

To understand why the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) for the diagnosis of depression became widely accepted and later rejected, we reviewed the sequence of publications in the DST literature. To evaluate the events, we developed and applied concepts of a five-phase process that can be used to assess the clinical utility of diagnostic marker tests. The review showed that when the DST was introduced into the clinical arena, the initial and final two phases of testing (I, IV, and V) had not been adequately conducted. When these phases of testing were suitably checked many years later, the Phase I studies (exploring basic mechanics of test procedures) showed that dexamethasone had variable bioavailability and that the cortisol assay procedure was unreliable. The Phase IV and V studies (examining test results in groups with suitably broad spectrums of cases and controls) showed that the test did not differentiate depression from most pertinent comorbid conditions. Beyond application to the specific problems of the DST, the proposed five phases of development and evaluation for diagnostic marker tests can be used to plan suitable research and avoid similar problems in the future.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The evaluation of genetic tests
Zimmern and Kroese
J Public Health (Oxf) 2007;29:246-250.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cytochrome P450 genotyping and antidepressants
Perlis
BMJ 2007;334:759-759.
FULL TEXT  

Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies
Tatsioni et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:1048-1055.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals
Siddiqui et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:261-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biomarkers: From Bedside to Bench and Back Again
Pollock
AJGP 2002;10:644-645.
FULL TEXT  

Neuroimaging Profiles and the Differential Therapies of Depression
Thase
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:651-653.
FULL TEXT  

Decreased Cortisol Levels in Adolescent Girls With Conduct Disorder
Pajer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:297-302.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine: Supporting Decision-Making
Price
Clin. Chem. 2000;46:1041-1050.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pleural Fluid pH as a Predictor of Pleurodesis Failure* : Analysis of Primary Data
Heffner et al.
Chest 2000;117:87-95.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Classic, Abbreviated, and Modified Light’s Criteria : The End of the Story?
Porcel et al.
Chest 1999;116:1833-1836.
FULL TEXT  

To test or not to test?
Holloway and Feasby
Neurology 1999;53:1905-1905.
FULL TEXT  

Bayesian Approaches to Meta-analysi of ROC Curves
Hellmich et al.
Med Decis Making 1999;19:252-264.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical Epidemiological Quality in Molecular Genetic Research: The Need for Methodological Standards
Bogardus et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1919-1926.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening Tests for Alcohol Use Disorders
Volk et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:779-780.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.