You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 259 No. 16, April 22, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

The cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening for low-income elderly women

J. S. Mandelblatt and M. C. Fahs
Department of Ambulatory Care, City Hospital Center, Elmhurst, NY.

Controversy surrounds prevention policy for the elderly. While some cost-effectiveness analyses have been done for the general elderly population, to our knowledge no study has examined the provision of preventive services to a low-income elderly population. We conducted a study of the cost-effectiveness of a cervical cancer screening program for infrequently screened elderly women attending an urban municipal hospital clinic. The results of Papanicolaou testing were abnormal (malignant or premalignant) in 11 of 816 women screened. This early detection of cervical neoplasia saved +5907 and 3.7 years of life per 100 Papanicolaou tests. When average medical costs per year of life extended by screening were included, the program cost +2874 per year of life saved. Comprehensive sensitivity analyses performed on competing medical and economic points of view did not change the conclusion of a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio for screening. Our findings indicate that the benefits from some prevention programs for the elderly can offset the costs of these programs. More research is needed to guide public policy on prevention for selected population groups.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The German Cervical Cancer Screening Model: development and validation of a decision-analytic model for cervical cancer screening in Germany
Siebert et al.
Eur J Public Health 2006;16:185-192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Overview of Cost-Utility Assessments in Oncology
Earle et al.
JCO 2000;18:3302-3317.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of the Conventional Papanicolaou Test With a New Adjunct to Cytological Screening for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix and Its Precursors
Taylor et al.
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:713-721.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation for Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Lee et al.
Blood 1998;92:4047-4052.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Prevention in Health Reform
Russell
NEJM 1993;329:352-354.
FULL TEXT  

CERVICAL SCREENING OF LOW-INCOME ELDERLY WOMEN IS COST SAVING
JWatch General 1988;1988:5-5.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.