This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (74)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Proposals to Make Good Tests Better

J. Sanford Schwartz, MD; Peter E. Dans, MD; Bruce P. Kinosian, MD

JAMA. 1988;259(17):2574-2579.

Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests are essential for detecting asymptomatic infection and are helpful in confirming the diagnoses of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome—related complex and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Nonetheless, many aspects of their use remain controversial, partly because of concerns about test accuracy. This article reviews the scientific basis for the evaluation, performance, and use of the most commonly employed HIV assays. Current test performance could be improved by better standardization of test procedures and institution of mandatory proficiency testing and licensure of clinical laboratories that perform HIV testing. Test utility could be enhanced by sequencing tests more appropriately and by interpreting test results in conjunction with the clinical purpose for which the test is being used and the characteristics of the population under study. Finally, HIV tests should be evaluated in a manner that minimizes spectrum and referral bias and inadequate reference standard confirmation, problems that have affected the evaluation of current tests.

(JAMA 1988;259:2574-2579)

Author Affiliations
From the Section of General Medicine, Department of Medicine (Dr Schwartz) and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (Drs Schwartz and Kinosian), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; the Office of Medical Practice Evaluation and Department of Medicine of The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore (Dr Dans); and the Division of General Medicine Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore (Dr Kinosian).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Section of General Medicine, Silverstein 3, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Dr Schwartz).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Report of a False-Positive HIV Test Result and the Potential Use of Additional Tests in Establishing HIV Serostatus
Mylonakis et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2386-2388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Meta-analytic Evaluation of the Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of HIV Infection in Infants
Owens et al.
JAMA 1996;275:1342-1348.
ABSTRACT  

The Cost-effectiveness of Voluntary Counseling and Testing of Hospital Inpatients for HIV Infection
Lurie et al.
JAMA 1994;272:1832-1838.
ABSTRACT  

Risk Factors for Repeatedly Reactive HIV-1 EIA and Indeterminate Western Blots: A Population-Based Case-Control Study
Celum et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1129-1137.
ABSTRACT  

The Cost-effectiveness of HIV Testing of Physicians and Dentists in the United States
Phillips et al.
JAMA 1994;271:851-858.
ABSTRACT  

Strategies for Screening Blood for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antibody: Use of a Decision Support System
Schwartz et al.
JAMA 1990;264:1704-1710.
ABSTRACT  

Knowing for the Sake of Knowing: The Value of Prognostic Information
Asch et al.
Med Decis Making 1990;10:47-57.
ABSTRACT  

Reporting the Results of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing
Benenson et al.
JAMA 1989;262:3435-3438.
ABSTRACT  

Voluntary Screening for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection: Weighing the Benefits and Harms
Bernard et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1989;110:727-733.
ABSTRACT  

HIV-1 Antibody Testing
Kitchen
JAMA 1988;260:1882-1883.
ABSTRACT