You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 259 No. 21, June 3, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ivermectin for the Treatment of Wuchereria bancrofti Filariasis

Efficacy and Adverse Reactions

V. Kumaraswami, MD; Eric A. Ottesen, MD; V. Vijayasekaran, MD; S. Uma Devi, MD; M. Swaminathan, MD; Mohammed A. Aziz, MD; G. R. Sarma, PhD; Ragneathi Prabhakar, MD; S. P. Tripathy, MD

JAMA. 1988;259(21):3150-3153.


Abstract

Ivermectin treatment was evaluated for efficacy and side effects in 40 patients in South India who had microfilaremia and bancroftian filariasis. Ivermectin was administered once orally at four dose levels (range, 25 to 200 µg/kg), and at each it was found to be completely effective in clearing blood microfilariae within five to 12 days. In most patients, microfilariae reappeared by three months; by six months the levels averaged 14% to 32% of pretreatment values in the four study groups, and all groups showed equivalent efficacy. Detailed monitoring identified some side effects in almost all patients: usually fever, headache, lightheadedness, myalgia, sore throat, or cough that occurred most prominently 18 to 36 hours after treatment. These were most frequent and severe in patients with the greatest microfilaremia, but only when treated with the two higher doses of ivermectin (100 and 200 µg/kg). The low-dose (25 µg/kg) ivermectin group, despite equivalent efficacy in parasite killing, had clinical reaction scores that were minimal and that were not correlated with parasitemia. Since efficacy and side effects of ivermectin therapy compare favorably with those reported for treatment with the standard antifilarial drug diethylcarbamazine citrate, the major advantage of single—oral-dose administration makes ivermectin the best candidate to replace diethylcarbamazine as the treatment of choice for bancroftian filariasis.

(JAMA 1988;259:3150-3153)



Author Affiliations

From the Tuberculosis Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Madras, India (Drs Kumaraswami, Sarma, and Prabhakar); the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr Ottesen); the Department of Pharmacology, Madras Medical College (Drs Vijayasekaran and Devi); the Department of Health, Corporation of Madras (Dr Swaminathan); Merck Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ (Dr Aziz); and the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi (Dr Tripathy).


Footnotes

{dagger}Dr Aziz died in November 1987.

Reprint requests to National Institutes of Health, Bldg 5, Room 112, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Dr Ottesen) or Tuberculosis Research Centre, Spur Tank Road, Madras 600031, India (Dr Kumaraswami).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perturbations in Eosinophil Homeostasis following Treatment of Lymphatic Filariasis
Gopinath et al.
Infect. Immun. 2000;68:93-99.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.