You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 259 No. 23, June 17, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Diagnostic and therapeutic technology assessment. Immunoaugmentative therapy


The scientific evidence to date, as well as the history of IAT, will allow no other conclusion than that IAT is unequivocally dangerous to its patients and of no proved value as a treatment for cancer. Physicians who know of patients receiving IAT must be aware of the high risk those people are incurring for life-threatening infections of several types.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Evaluation of "Immunoaugmentative Therapy (IAT)": An Unconventional Cancer Treatment
Pfeifer and Jonas
Integr Cancer Ther 2003;2:112-119.
ABSTRACT  

IMMUNOAUGMENTATIVE THERAPY FOR CANCER CALLED ""UNACCEPTABLE""
JWatch General 1988;1988:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.