You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 259 No. 3, January 15, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (87)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cost-effectiveness of Prenatal Screening and Immunization for Hepatitis B Virus

Jose Alberto Arevalo, MD; A. Eugene Washington, MD, MSc

JAMA. 1988;259(3):365-369.


Abstract

Perinatal transmission of hepatitis B virus is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, yet controversy still exists regarding the value of routine screening of pregnant women in the United States and subsequent immunization of their at-risk neonates. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of such a screening and immunization program, we developed a decision analysis model and obtained data from published reports, chart review, and a Delphi survey to determine outcome probabilities and costs. When considering direct and indirect costs, routine screening and immunization would be cost-effective at a prevalence of 0.06%, significantly lower than the national prevalence of 0.2%. At an annual national birth rate of 3.5 million births, a national policy of routine screening of all pregnant women would result in an annual net savings of more than $105 million. In the high-risk groups, as many as 140 cases of acute neonatal hepatitis and as many as 1400 cases of chronic liver disease would be prevented yearly per 100 000 pregnant women screened, at a net annual savings of as much as $765 million.

(JAMA 1988;259:365-369)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Family Practice, University of California at Davis, Sacramento (Dr Arevalo); the Division of Family and Community Medicine (Dr Arevalo) and the Clinical Epidemiology Program, Institute for Health Policy Studies (Dr Washington), University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco; and the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine (Dr Washington).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Family Practice, University of California at Davis, Medical Center, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817 (Dr Arevalo).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Economic Evaluation of the 7-Vaccine Routine Childhood Immunization Schedule in the United States, 2001
Zhou et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:1136-1144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical and Economic Impact of a Combination Haemophilus influenzae and Hepatitis B Vaccine: Estimating Cost-effectiveness Using Decision Analysis
Fendrick et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:126-136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposal for routine antenatal screening at 14 weeks for hepatitis B surface antigen
Grosheide et al.
BMJ 1995;311:1197-1199.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Transmission by Immunization: An Economic Analysis of Current Recommendations
Margolis et al.
JAMA 1995;274:1201-1208.
ABSTRACT  

Hepatitis B in a Prenatal Population-Reply
Silverman and Wapner
JAMA 1993;269:589-590.
ABSTRACT  

Hepatitis B Prevalence in an Unregistered Prenatal Population: Implications for Neonatal Therapy
Silverman et al.
JAMA 1991;266:2852-2855.
ABSTRACT  

Economics
Eisenberg
JAMA 1989;261:2840-2841.
ABSTRACT  

Prenatal Screening for Hepatitis B Antigen
Ross
JAMA 1989;261:1727-1727.
ABSTRACT  

Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee Prevention of Perinatal Transmission of Hepatitis B Virus: Prenatal Screening of all Pregnant Women for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1988;142:921-923.
ABSTRACT  

Prevention of Perinatal Transmission of Hepatitis B Virus: Prenatal Screening of all Pregnant Women for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen
JAMA 1988;260:165-170.
ABSTRACT  

Prenatal Screening for Hepatitis B
Koplan
JAMA 1988;259:3408-3408.
ABSTRACT  

PRENATAL SCREENING FOR HEPATITIS B IS COST-EFFECTIVE
JWatch General 1988;1988:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Routine Prenatal Screening for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen
Kane et al.
JAMA 1988;259:408-409.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.