You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 260 No. 1, July 1, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (43)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quality Medical Care

A Definition

Grant E. Steffen, MD, MA

JAMA. 1988;260(1):56-61.


Abstract

This article offers a definition of quality medical care. Quality itself is defined not as consisting of the properties of an object but rather as the capacity of these properties to achieve goals. Accordingly, quality medical care is the capacity of the elements of that care to achieve legitimate medical and nonmedical goals. This definition is compared with other current definitions. I offer answers to the questions of how to choose goals, who chooses goals, and what are legitimate goals. Implications of this definition are discussed, particularly with reference to chart review. Because patient values shape goals and because these values are not always assessed and recorded, it is recommended that a formal assessment of patient values become part of the patient's record.

(JAMA 1988;260:56-61)



Author Affiliations

From The Center for Values and Social Policy, the Department of Philosophy, University of Colorado at Boulder.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to 601 E Hampden, Englewood, CO 80110.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical governance is unworkable
Grosch
Br. J. Sports. Med. 2004;38:365-365.
FULL TEXT  

Task Force 1. Report of the Task Force on Patient Expectations, Core Values, Reintegration, and the New Model of Family Medicine
Task Force 1 Writing Group et al.
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:S33-S50.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Organizing Regional Perinatal Quality Improvement: Global Considerations and Local Implementation
Wirtschafter and Powers
NeoReviews 2004;5:e50-59.
FULL TEXT  

Chart Review: A Need for Reappraisal
Wu and Ashton
Eval Health Prof 1997;20:146-163.
ABSTRACT  

Physician-Patient Satisfaction: Equity in the Health Services Encounter
Koehler et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1992;49:455-484.
 

The Organization and the Injured Worker
Hogan
Med Care Res Rev 1991;48:449-472.
 

Family Consent to Orders Not to Resuscitate
Steffen
JAMA 1991;265:354-354.
ABSTRACT  

The Quality of Care Is Unmeasurable: An Equation, a Paralogism, a Paraphrasis, a Quackery... and a Reply
Sinnreich
JAMA 1989;261:700-701.
ABSTRACT  

Predicting and Evaluating Patient Outcomes
Knaus and Nash
ANN INTERN MED 1988;109:521-522.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.