You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 260 No. 17, November 4, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Toward Optimal Laboratory Use
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Testing Cholesterol Accuracy

Performance of Several Common Laboratory Instruments

David D. Koch, PhD; David J. Hassemer, MS; Donald A. Wiebe, PhD; Ronald H. Laessig, PhD

JAMA. 1988;260(17):2552-2557.


Abstract

The national emphasis on assessing coronary risk by cholesterol testing mandates that analytical determinations be as accurate and precise as is medically necessary. One goal of the National Cholesterol Education Program is to improve the quality of laboratory tests. Currently, 5% limits of imprecision and 5% of bias vs the nationally accepted Abell-Kendall reference method is recommended, with a goal of reducing these limits to 3% by 1992. Clinicians must be aware of how the cholesterol values are obtained, and especially whether the laboratory's method meets the performance goals. We assayed patients' serum samples for cholesterol using several commercially available, routinely used enzymatic methods and by the Abell-Kendall reference method. Precision of these methods was also assessed using serum-based controls. All instruments were operated precisely according to the manufacturers' instructions. Performance was objectively judged based on the National Cholesterol Education Program goals and on medically allowable total error. In all cases, the DuPont aca, the Kodak Ektachem, the Hitachi 737, and the Cobas FARA determined cholesterol levels acceptably. The precision and accuracy goals of 3% are achievable by these methods.

(JAMA 1988;260:2552-2557)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Drs Koch, Wiebe, and Laessig) and Preventive Medicine (Dr Laessig); the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Hospital and Clinics (Drs Koch and Wiebe); and the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (Mr Hassemer and Dr Laessig), University of Wisconsin, Madison.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Ave, B4/262 CSC, Madison, WI 53792 (Dr Koch).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cholesterol Screening: Once Is Not Enough
Wilson
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2146-2147.
ABSTRACT  

Screening Asymptomatic Adults for Cardiac Risk Factors: The Serum Cholesterol Level
Garber et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1989;110:622-639.
ABSTRACT  

COMMERCIAL CHOLESTEROL ASSAYS PROVE ACCURATE
JWatch General 1988;1988:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.