A clinical assessment of MedisGroups

L. I. Iezzoni and M. A. Moskowitz
Evans Memorial Department of Clinical Research and Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, MA.

Interest has focused recently on measuring severity of illness, both to improve the fairness of diagnosis related group-based reimbursement and to facilitate judgments about hospital quality of care. MedisGroups is a prominent, proprietary severity-measurement system, recently mandated for use by all Pennsylvania hospitals. We reviewed MedisGroups and its key clinical findings. MedisGroups produces admission scores, from 0 through 4, indicating increasing risk of imminent organ failure. Score computation is independent of diagnosis, but many key clinical findings are disease specific and require particular diagnostic technologies. Using a database including patients 65 years of age and older from 24 hospitals, we found that fewer than 1% of patients with scores of 0 or 1 died in-hospital, compared with 60% of those with scores of 4. Questions remain about the impact of the procedural nature of many key clinical findings and the independence from diagnosis. Further study is needed to determine the utility of MedisGroups for policy purposes.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Atypical Coverage for Community-acquired Pneumonia
Arnold et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;176:1289-1290.
FULL TEXT  

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Health-care-Associated Pneumonia: Results From a Large US Database of Culture-Positive Pneumonia
Kollef et al.
Chest 2005;128:3854-3862.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Empirical Atypical Coverage for Inpatients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Shefet et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1992-2000.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nursing Staff Reductions in Pennsylvania Hospitals: Exploring the Discrepancy between Perceptions and Data
Unruh
Med Care Res Rev 2002;59:197-214.
ABSTRACT  

Using Severity-adjusted Mortality to Compare Performance in a Veterans Mffairs Hospital and in Private-sector Hospitals
Gordon et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2000;15:207-211.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing the Generalizability of Prognostic Information
Justice et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:515-524.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Influence of Chronic Disease on Resource Utilization in Common Acute Pediatric Conditions: Financial Concerns for Children's Hospitals
Silber et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:169-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pennsylvania's Focus on Heart Attack -- Grading the Scorecard
Jollis and Romano
NEJM 1998;338:983-987.
FULL TEXT  

A Prediction Rule to Identify Low-Risk Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Fine et al.
NEJM 1997;336:243-250.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting In-hospital Mortality for Stroke Patients: Results Differ across Severity-measurement Methods
Iezzoni et al.
Med Decis Making 1996;16:348-356.
ABSTRACT  

Healthcare outcomes management and quality improvement
Al-Assaf
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 1996;116:245-252.
ABSTRACT  

Postoperative Adverse Events of Cholecystectomy in the Medicare Population
Rosen et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1995;10:29-37.
ABSTRACT  

Risk Adjustment Methods Can Affect Perceptions of Outcomes
Iezzoni et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1994;9:43-48.
ABSTRACT  

A Measure of Mortality Risk for Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Van Ruiswyk et al.
Med Decis Making 1993;13:152-160.
ABSTRACT  

The role of chemotherapy in the hospice patient: A problem of definition
Miller
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 1989;6:19-26.