 |
 |

Comparative Immunogenicity of Plasma and Recombinant Hepatitis B Virus Vaccines in Homosexual Men
Nancy Odaka, MHS;
Lois Eldred, MPH;
Sylvia Cohn, MPH;
Alvaro Muñoz, PhD;
Howard A. Fields, PhD;
Robin Fox, MS;
Rachel Solomon, MHS;
Richard Kaslow, MD;
B. Frank Polk, MD
JAMA. 1988;260(24):3635-3637.
Abstract
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of plasma-derived and DNA recombinant hepatitis B virus vaccines was conducted in 186 homosexual men. Nine months after the immunization series (three doses) began, the seroconversion rate in the plasma vaccine group was 88% (68/77); this was significantly higher than the 74% (60/81) response rate of the recombinant vaccine group. Men positive for antibody to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) had a considerably higher nonresponse rate to either vaccine than expected in non—HIV-infected homosexual men. The odds ratios of nonresponse to hepatitis B virus vaccine for HIV-seropositive vs HIV-seronegative subjects were 12.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.7to 89.3) and 13.6 (95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 148.3) for the plasma and DNA recombinant vaccines, respectively.
(JAMA 1988;260:3635-3637)
Author Affiliations
From The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore (Mss Odaka, Eldred, Cohn, and Fox and Dr Muñoz); the Hepatitis Branch, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta (Dr Fields); and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Md (Ms Solomon and Dr Kaslow).
Footnotes
Dr Polk died Oct 11,1988.
Reprint requests to The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, 550 N Broadway, Suite 701, Baltimore, MD 21205 (Ms Odaka).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Use of Licensed Vaccines for Active Immunization of the Immunocompromised Host
Pirofski and Casadevall
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998;11:1-26.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Individuals: A Clinical Review
Regan
Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1741-1744.
ABSTRACT
|