 |
|
Comparison of Critical Care Provided by Family Physicians and General Internists
Barry L. Hainer, MD;
Frank H. Lawler, MD
JAMA. 1988;260(3):354-358.
Abstract
| |
Privilege conflicts and credentialing issues involving family physicians' care of hospitalized patients are controversial areas. This study compares the process and outcome of critical care provided by family physicians and general internists. We studied 523 patients admitted by these specialists to the medical intensive and cardiac care units of a large regional hospital over a one-year period. The length of stay and readmission rate in the intensive care unit and hospital, severity of illness, discharge diagnosis, proportion who died, time until death of those who died, consultation rate, and hospital charges did not differ significantly between patients cared for by physicians in the two specialties. Application of Cox's proportional hazard model to the data indicated the risk of death to be significantly related to patient race, age, and severity of illness, but not to physician specialty. Regression analysis of several morbidity variables showed no relationship to physician specialty. Lack of differences in outcome and process in the hospital studied leads us to believe that both family physicians and general internists are entitled to have equal access to the care of patients in critical care units.
(JAMA 1988;260:354-358)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Family Medicine, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC.
Footnotes
Reprint requests to Department of Family Medicine, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858-1988 (Dr Hainer).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Progression of Functional Disability in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Associations With Rheumatology Subspecialty Care
Ward et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2229-2237.
ABSTRACT
Comparison of Critical Care by Family Physicians and General Internists
Carlson et al.
JAMA 1989;261:243-243.
ABSTRACT
|
