You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 260 No. 6, August 12, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

An ethics consultation service in a teaching hospital. Utilization and evaluation

J. La Puma, C. B. Stocking, M. D. Silverstein, A. DiMartini and M. Siegler
Section of Clinical Ethics, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL 60068.

A newly established formal ethics consultation service in a university teaching hospital was prospectively evaluated. A physician-ethicist interviewed and examined patients, interviewed family and others as needed, and entered a formal consultation note in the medical record. The requesting physician and the consultant independently completed structured questionnaires. Fifty-one consultation requests were received from 45 physicians from seven departments between July 1, 1986, and June 30, 1987. Seventeen (33%) of 51 patients were in the intensive care unit, and 19 patients (37%) were fully oriented at the time of consultation. Overall, 61% of the patients survived to leave the hospital. The requesting physician sought assistance with withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in 49% of cases, with resuscitation issues in 37%, and with legal issues in 31%. Assistance with more than one issue was sought in 39 cases (76%). In 36 cases (71%), the requesting physician stated that the consultation was "very important" in patient management, in clarifying ethical issues, or in learning about medical ethics. We conclude that ethics consultation performed by physician-ethicists provides useful, clinically acceptable assistance in a teaching hospital.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluating ethics consultation: randomised controlled trial is not the right tool
Chen and Chen
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:594-597.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Report of 255 Clinical Ethics Consultations and Review of the Literature
Swetz et al.
Mayo Clin. Proc. 2007;82:686-691.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis
Hurst et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2005;31:7-14.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Ethics Consultations on Nonbeneficial Life-Sustaining Treatments in the Intensive Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Schneiderman et al.
JAMA 2003;290:1166-1172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK
Slowther et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2001;27:i2-8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethics Committees: Time to Experiment with Standards
Fletcher and Hoffmann
ANN INTERN MED 1994;120:335-338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Models for Clinical Ethics Consultation Reimbursement
Puma
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:1276-1280.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.