You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 261 No. 1, January 6, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (68)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparing the Prevalence of Smoking in Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women, 1985 to 1986

David F. Williamson, PhD; Mary K. Serdula, MD; Juliette S. Kendrick, MD; Nancy J. Binkin, MD

JAMA. 1989;261(1):70-74.


Abstract

The 1990 health objectives for the nation state that pregnant women should be only half as likely to smoke as nonpregnant women. To assess progress toward meeting this objective, we used cross-sectional data from the 26 states in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 1985 and 1986. We compared the prevalence of self-reported smoking among pregnant (N = 836) and non-pregnant (N = 18 025) women aged 18 to 45 years. Overall, pregnant women were 70% as likely to be current smokers as nonpregnant women (prevalence ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.6 to 0.8), while blacks showed the largest pregnancy-associated reduction in the prevalence of smoking (prevalence ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.9). Most of the difference in smoking prevalence occurred not because pregnant women were less likely to have ever smoked, but because pregnant women were more likely to have quit smoking than nonpregnant women. However, unmarried pregnant white women were 40% more likely to smoke than their nonpregnant counterparts (prevalence ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.7). We conclude from this analysis that the 1990 health objective for smoking among pregnant women is unlikely to be achieved. Clinicians providing care to pregnant women need to pay increased attention to smoking cessation.

(JAMA 1989;261:70-74)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Nutrition Division, Centers for Disease Control, Bldg 3, SB/45-A, Mailstop A-41, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Dr Williamson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Polymorphisms in metabolic genes CYP1A1 and GSTM1 and changes in maternal smoking during pregnancy
Chen and Woodcroft
Nicotine Tob Res 2009;11:225-233.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Negative Pregnancy Test: An Opportunity for Preconception Care
Jack et al.
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:340-345.
ABSTRACT  

Cigarette Smoking Among Reproductive-Aged Women--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1989
JAMA 1991;266:3111-3112.
 

Nicotine Replacement Therapy During Pregnancy
Benowitz
JAMA 1991;266:3174-3177.
ABSTRACT  

Trends in Teenage Smoking During Pregnancy: Washington State: 1984 Through 1988
Davis et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1990;144:1297-1301.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.