You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 261 No. 1, January 6, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Surgeon General's Warnings in Outdoor Cigarette Advertising

Are They Readable?

Ronald M. Davis, MD; Juliette S. Kendrick, MD

JAMA. 1989;261(1):90-94.


Abstract

Outdoor advertising media represent a major vehicle by which cigarette companies promote their products. We investigated the readability of the Surgeon General's warning in cigarette advertisements (ads) in two outdoor media: billboards and taxicab ads. In an experiment in metropolitan Atlanta under typical driving conditions, observers were able to read the entire health warning on 18 (46%) of 39 street billboards but on only two (5%) of 39 highway billboards. In contrast, the content of the ads (ie, brand name, other wording, and notable imagery) could be recognized under the same conditions on more than 95% of the billboards. In a similar study of 100 taxicab cigarette ads in New York City, observers were unable to read the health warning in any of the ads but were able to identify the brand name in all ads and notable imagery in 95% of the ads. Significant differences between the readability of the warning and identification of the advertising content persisted even when partially read warnings were considered to have been read. We conclude that the Surgeon General's warning is not readable in its current form in the vast majority of billboard and taxicab ads. Factors contributing to unreadability include the small size of the letters, the excessive length of the warnings, the distance between the viewers and the ads, and movement between the viewers and the ads.

(JAMA 1989;261:90-94)



Author Affiliations

From the Office on Smoking and Health (Dr Davis) and the Pregnancy Epidemiology Branch, Division of Reproductive Health (Dr Kendrick), Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857 (Dr Davis).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Remembering Ron Davis
Cummings et al.
Tobacco Control 2009;18:70-71.
FULL TEXT  

Cartoon Characters as Tobacco Warning Labels
Duffy and Burton
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:1230-1236.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Cigarette Warning Labels Reduce Smoking? Paradoxical Effects Among Adolescents
Robinson and Killen
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:267-272.
ABSTRACT  

Environmental and Policy Interventions to Control Tobacco Use and Prevent Cardiovascular Disease
Brownson et al.
Health Educ Behav 1995;22:478-498.
ABSTRACT  

Proposition 65: More Warning About the Risks of Tobacco
Davis
JAMA 1989;262:1632-1633.
ABSTRACT  

The Warnings on Cigarette Packages Are Ineffective
Richards et al.
JAMA 1989;261:45-45.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.