This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Toward an Understanding of Necessary Fallibility

Robert E. Anderson, MD; Rolla B. Hill, MD; Charles R. Key, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1989;261(11):1610-1617.

Abstract
Published studies encompassing more than 50 000 autopsies were assessed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics (the diagnostic process) in persons dying of 1 of 11 specific diseases during the period 1930 through 1977. The accuracy of clinical diagnostics, as reflected in these two determinations, appeared to improve over this period with respect to some of the diseases studied (rheumatic heart disease and leukemia), while for others it worsened (pulmonary tuberculosis, peritonitis, carcinoma of the lung, gastric carcinoma, and carcinoma of the liver and extrahepatic biliary tract) and for a significant number diagnostic accuracy seemed refractory to sustained change (pulmonary embolism, primary cirrhosis of the liver, gastric/peptic ulcer, and acute coronary thrombosis/myocardial infarction). The findings suggest a new way in which the autopsy can be used to monitor clinical diagnostics to identify possible sources of systematic weaknesses and provide data that can be used to approach the difficult subject of necessary fallibility.

(JAMA. 1989;261:1610-1617)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Pathology (Drs Anderson and Key) and the New Mexico Tumor Registry (Dr Key), University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque; and the Department of Pathology, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse (Dr Hill).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 915 Stanford Dr NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131 (Dr Anderson).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Accuracy of Diagnostic Procedures: Has It Improved Over the Past Five Decades?
Berlin
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;188:1173-1178.
FULL TEXT  

A pilot study in ophthalmology of inter-rater reliability in classifying diagnostic errors: an underinvestigated area of medical error
Margo
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:416-420.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Rates of Autopsy-Detected Diagnostic Errors Over Time: A Systematic Review
Shojania et al.
JAMA 2003;289:2849-2856.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Institute of Medicine Medical Error Figures Are Not Exaggerated
Leape
JAMA 2000;284:95-97.
FULL TEXT  

Journey toward Computer-aided Diagnosis: Role of Image Texture Analysis
Tourassi
Radiology 1999;213:317-320.
FULL TEXT  

Latent Structure Analysis of Classification Errors in Screening and Clinical Diagnosis: An Alternative to Classification Analysis
Bergan et al.
Applied Psychological Measurement 1999;23:69-86.
ABSTRACT  

An Employer's Perspective on Hospitalists as a Source of Improved Health Care Value
Milstein
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:360-363.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Obtaining consent for autopsy in dementia research: The Memory and Aging Project experience
Norton and Morris
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 1996;11:2-6.
ABSTRACT  

Error in Medicine
Leape
JAMA 1994;272:1851-1857.
ABSTRACT  

How Much Routine Preoperative Laboratory Testing Is Enough?
Velanovich
American Journal of Medical Quality 1993;8:145-151.
ABSTRACT  

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values in the 'Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Diagnostics'
Holmes
JAMA 1989;262:351-351.
ABSTRACT  

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values in the 'Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Diagnostics'
Miller
JAMA 1989;262:350-350.
ABSTRACT  

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values in the 'Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Diagnostics'
Woodruff and Baron
JAMA 1989;262:350-350.
ABSTRACT  

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values in the 'Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Diagnostics'
Bates
JAMA 1989;262:350-351.
ABSTRACT