You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 261 No. 12, March 24, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cryotherapy in Infants With Retinopathy of Prematurity

A Decision Model for Treating One or Both Eyes

Dale L. Phelps, MD; Charles E. Phelps, PhD

JAMA. 1989;261(12):1751-1756.


Abstract

Formal decision model analysis for cryotherapy to reduce blindness from retinopathy of prematurity shows that the decision to treat depends substantially on disease severity, the probability of long-term side effects, and correlations of treatment outcomes and side effects for individuals in whom both eyes are treated. The model indicates that both eyes should be treated regardless of disease severity only when the probability of long-term side effects is zero. As risks of long-term side effects increase, treating neither eye or only the worst eye is preferred for an increasingly large spectrum of disease. With high correlations of long-term side effects, treating the worst eye is preferred for moderate levels of disease severity. For high disease severity, treating both eyes is recommended, even when the probability of long-term side effects is high. Better-informed treatment recommendations must await new data to assess risks of long-term side effects and correlations of treatment outcomes and side effects.

(JAMA 1989;261:1751-1756)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Pediatrics and Ophthalmology, University of Rochester (NY) School of Medicine and Dentistry (Dr D. L. Phelps), and the Departments of Political Science and Economics, University of Rochester (Dr C. E. Phelps).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Pediatrics, Box 651, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY (Dr D. L. Phelps).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: None, One, or Both Eyes
Hindle
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:1375-1375.
ABSTRACT  

Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: None, One, or Both Eyes-Reply
Palmer et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:1375-1376.
ABSTRACT  

Cryotherapy in Infants With Retinopathy of Prematurity
Hindle
JAMA 1990;263:2052-2052.
ABSTRACT  

Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: Three-Month Outcome
Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Coopera
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:195-204.
ABSTRACT  

To Best Was Always to Worst, but Worse Is Better, if Good and Bad Are Relevant
Banzhaf
JAMA 1989;262:210-210.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.