You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 261 No. 12, March 24, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Classification and Analysis of Fetal Deaths in Massachusetts

Edward J. Lammer, MD; Lisa E. Brown, MPH; Marlene T. Anderka, MPH; Bernard Guyer, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1989;261(12):1757-1762.


Abstract

Fetal deaths, in contrast to infant deaths, have been subject to epidemiologic analysis infrequently. We characterized 574 Massachusetts resident fetal deaths from 1982 and assessed the accuracy of cause-of-death information available from vital records compared with that from corresponding fetal autopsies. The fetal death rate exceeded the neonatal mortality rate. Fetal mortality was higher among black, unmarried, and older mothers. Fetuses of multiplegestation pregnancies had an unusually high risk of fetal death. Autopsy reports were obtained for 61% of fetal deaths. The underlying cause of death from the fetal death record differed from that on the autopsy report in 55% of cases. Systematic collection of population-based autopsy data is a useful approach for improving the quality and accuracy of mortality statistics on fetal deaths. Many stillbirths remain unexplained, however, and research is needed to identify pathological markers that might reduce the heterogeneity within the fetal deaths currently ascribed to unknown causes.

(JAMA. 1989;261:1757-1762)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Family Health Services, Massachusetts Department of Public Health (Drs Lammer and Guyer and Mss Brown and Anderka); the Embryology-Teratology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital (Dr Lammer); and the Department of Maternal and Child Health, Harvard School of Public Health (Dr Guyer), Boston, Mass. Dr Lammer is now with the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, Emeryville.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, 5900 Hollis St, Suite A, Emeryville, CA 94608 (Dr Lammer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review
Huang et al.
CMAJ 2008;178:165-172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Validity of Maternal and Perinatal Risk Factors Reported on Fetal Death Certificates
Lydon-Rochelle et al.
AJPH 2005;95:1948-1951.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RE: "CASE-COHORT ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS NEAR MATERNAL RESIDENCE AND SELECTED CAUSES OF FETAL DEATH"
Kirby et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:779-780.
FULL TEXT  

Reestimating Date of Delivery in Multifetal Pregnancies
Minakami and Sato
JAMA 1996;275:1432-1434.
ABSTRACT  

Socioeconomic Status and Risk for Substandard Medical Care
Burstin et al.
JAMA 1992;268:2383-2387.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.