Case mix and resource utilization by uninsured hospital patients in the Boston metropolitan area
J. Weissman and A. M. Epstein
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
Rising competitive pressures may place uninsured patients at risk for
receiving fewer services than insured patients with similar medical
conditions. To examine this possibility we studied the case mix, length of
stay, and number of procedures for 65,032 patients listed as self-pay or
free care, Blue Cross, or Medicaid at 52 hospitals in the Boston, Mass,
area during 1983. We found that the overall case mix severity index (based
on expected length of stay per diagnosis related group) for uninsured
patients was 30% higher in public hospitals and 8% higher in major teaching
hospitals compared with other institutions. Across all hospitals, the
severity index of uninsured patients was similar to that of insured
patients. However, after adjusting for diagnosis related group case mix,
uninsured patients had, on average, 7% shorter stays (5.36 vs 5.79 days)
and underwent 7% fewer procedures (1.16 vs 1.25) than Blue Cross patients,
the differences varying with hospital type. Uninsured patients also had
shorter stays on average than Medicaid patients (5.36 vs 5.87 days), but
they underwent a similar number of procedures. These results suggest that
patients who lack insurance may receive unequal treatment even after being
hospitalized.
Physician-attributable Differences in Intensive Care Unit Costs: A Single-Center Study
Garland et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;174:1206-1210.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Hey Brother, How's Your Health?: A Focus Group Analysis of the Health and Health-Related Concerns of African American Men in a Southern City in the United States
Royster et al.
Men and Masculinities 2006;8:389-404.
ABSTRACT
Improving the ICU: Part 1
Garland
Chest 2005;127:2151-2164.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Care for Women Undergoing a Hysterectomy: Effects of Insurance and Race/Ethnicity
Hakim et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2004;94:1399-1405.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cancer Survival in Kentucky and Health Insurance Coverage
McDavid et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2135-2144.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Applying a Prediction Rule To Identify Low-Risk Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Marras et al.
Chest 2000;118:1339-1343.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Excess mortality from avoidable and non-avoidable causes in men of low socioeconomic status: a prospective study in Korea
Song and Byeon
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2000;54:166-172.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Case-Mix Adjustment Using Administrative Databases: A Paradigm to Guide Future Research
Wray et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1997;54:326-356.
ABSTRACT
The Effect of Insurance Status on Likelihood of Neonatal Interhospital Transfer
Durbin et al.
Pediatrics 1997;100:e8-e8.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Insurance-Related Differences in the Risk of Ruptured Appendix
Braveman et al.
NEJM 1994;331:444-449.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Effect of Cost-Containment Policies on Rates of Coronary Revascularization in California
Langa and Sussman
NEJM 1993;329:1784-1789.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Relation between Health Insurance Coverage and Clinical Outcomes among Women with Breast Cancer
Ayanian et al.
NEJM 1993;329:326-331.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Private Outlets for Public Limitations: The Rise of Commercial Health Insurance in Israel
Cohen and Barnea
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1992;17:783-812.
ABSTRACT