This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (58)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Results From the National Medicare Competition Evaluation

Louis F. Rossiter, PhD; Kathryn Langwell, MA; Thomas T. H. Wan, PhD; Margaret Rivnyak, MS

JAMA. 1989;262(1):57-63.

Abstract
More than 1 million Medicare beneficiaries have enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and competitive medical plans under a new program in which beneficiaries can freely enroll in a risk-based HMO in their area or remain in the fee-for-service sector under Medicare. Based on a randomly selected nationwide sample of beneficiaries, we analyzed differences in patient satisfaction between 2091 beneficiaries who were continuously enrolled in an HMO plan for 1 year and 1000 beneficiaries in the fee-for-service sector. We also studied the reasons for disenrollment. No significant difference in overall satisfaction was found between HMO enrollees and fee-for-service beneficiaries. However, HMO enrollees expressed less satisfaction compared with fee-for-service beneficiaries regarding the professional competence of their health care providers and the willingness of the HMO staff to discuss problems. On the other hand, HMO enrollees were more satisfied than fee-for-service beneficiaries with waiting times and claims processing. Approximately half of the disenrollment from an HMO within 1 year was attributed to misunderstanding the terms of enrollment.

(JAMA. 1989;262:57-63)

Author Affiliations
From the David G. Williamson Institute for Health Studies of the Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (Drs Rossiter and Wan and Ms Rivnyak); and Mathematica Policy Research, Inc, Washington, DC (Ms Langwell).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to the David G. Williamson Institute for Health Studies, Box 206, MCV Station, Richmond, VA 23298-0206 (Dr Rossiter).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of Performance of Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Managed Care
Landon et al.
JAMA 2004;291:1744-1752.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Defining the Future of Primary Care: What Can We Learn from Patients?
Safran
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:248-255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary Care Quality in the Medicare Program: Comparing the Performance of Medicare Health Maintenance Organizations and Traditional Fee-for-Service Medicare
Safran et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:757-765.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Plan Characteristics And Consumers' Assessments Of Quality
Landon et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:274-286.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biased Selection and Medicare HMOs: Analysis of the 1989-1994 Experience
Cox and Hogan
Med Care Res Rev 1997;54:259-274.
ABSTRACT  

Managed Care and Medicare Reform
Oberlander
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1997;22:595-631.
ABSTRACT  

Prior and Current Costs in Capitated Health Plans: The Effects of Health Status at Enrollment
Manton et al.
J Aging Health 1996;8:183-206.
ABSTRACT  

Managed Care Plan Performance Since 1980: A Literature Analysis
Miller and Luft
JAMA 1994;271:1512-1519.
ABSTRACT  

Health Care Reform, Primary Care, and the Need for Research
Franks et al.
JAMA 1993;270:1449-1453.
ABSTRACT  

Satisfaction with Medical Care among Elderly People in Fee-for-Service Care and an HMO
Kasper and Riley
J Aging Health 1992;4:282-302.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Cost Containment on the Care of Elderly Diabetics
Retchin and Preston
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2244-2248.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of Behavioral Demand Models of Consumer Choice in Health Care
Siddharthan
Eval Rev 1991;15:455-470.
ABSTRACT  

Policy Failure: The Non-Reform of American Health Care
Wood
Public Policy and Administration 1990;5:19-36.