You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 262 No. 10, September 8, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physicians Who Have Lost Their Malpractice Insurance

Their Demographic Characteristics and the Surplus-Lines Companies That Insure Them

William B. Schwartz, MD; Daniel N. Mendelson

JAMA. 1989;262(10):1335-1341.


Abstract

The present study analyzes demographic data on 920 physicians who lost their coverage and applied to a "surplus-lines" company that insures essentially all applicants. Our analysis reveals that (1) some specialties are heavily overrepresented in the surplus-lines pool, (2) physicians aged 45 to 54 years are also overrepresented, (3) board certification is seen as frequently in the surplus-lines group as in the US physician population, and (4) the percentage of foreign medical graduates in the surplus-lines pool is virtually the same as that in the US physician population. A model of the actuarial process by which claims data can lead to termination of standard coverage suggests that disproportionate representation of high-risk specialties is not simply a function of a high average claims rate. We also show that, in contrast to joint underwriting associations, surpluslines companies impose high premiums, large deductibles, and restrictions on practice, all of which are likely to reduce the frequency of negligent behavior.

(JAMA. 1989;262:1335-1341)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (Dr Schwartz and Mr Mendelson), and The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif (Dr Schwartz).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 (Dr Schwartz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medical Malpractice
Studdert et al.
NEJM 2004;350:283-292.
FULL TEXT  

Physicians Disciplined by a State Medical Board
Morrison and Wickersham
JAMA 1998;279:1889-1893.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Quality of Care of International Medical Graduates: How does it Compare to that of U.S. Medical Graduates?
Mick and Comfort
Med Care Res Rev 1997;54:379-413.
ABSTRACT  

The Doctor-Patient Relationship and Malpractice: Lessons From Plaintiff Depositions
Beckman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1365-1370.
ABSTRACT  

The Role of Physician-Owned Insurance Companies in the Detection and Deterrence of Negligence
Schwartz and Mendelson
JAMA 1989;262:1342-1346.
ABSTRACT  

Physicians Looking at Themselves
Todd
JAMA 1989;262:1376-1377.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.