This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (41)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Effect on Outcome

Michael H. Malloy, MD, MSc; George G. Rhoads, MD, MPH; Wayne Schramm, MA; Garland Land, MPH

JAMA. 1989;262(11):1475-1478.

Abstract
Examination of a linked birth and death certificate file from Missouri revealed a remarkable increase in the use of cesarean section for very low—birth weight infants (500 to 1499 g) from 24% to 44% in the years 1980 to 1984. In the same years the rate for 1500- to 2499-g infants went from 21% to 26% and the rate for 2500- to 7000-g infants went from 14% to 18%. We studied first-day death rates in very low—birth weight infants as an indicator of potential benefit from this increase in cesarean sections. During the 5-year period first-day deaths averaged 10% and 22% in the cesarean and vaginal birth groups, respectively. This difference was explained almost entirely by deaths in the 500- to 740-g birth weight group, where the death rates were 33% and 59%, respectively. Although this difference remained statistically significant after adjustment for gestational age and other factors that differed between the groups, it was nullified by an excess of deaths in the succeeding 6 days of life. Overall, the odds of death in the first week in these infants weighing 500 to 749 g was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.39) in the cesarean vs vaginal deliveries. We conclude that there is little evidence that the use of cesarean section for the delivery of very low—birth weight infants, independent of maternal or fetal compromise, improves overall survival. We were unable to find reasons to justify the sharp increase in the use of cesarean sections for these small infants.

(JAMA. 1989;262:1475-1478)

Author Affiliations
From the Prevention Research Program, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Md (Drs Malloy and Rhoads); and the Missouri Department of Health, Jefferson City (Messrs Schramm and Land).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to NICHD/NIH, Executive Plaza North Bldg, Room 640, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Dr Malloy).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of Cesarean Section on Neonatal Mortality Rates Among Very Preterm Infants in the United States, 2000-2003
Malloy
Pediatrics 2008;122:285-292.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of Neonatal Intensive Care for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Kilbride
Pediatrics 2004;114:1374-1374.
FULL TEXT  

Perinatal Care at the Threshold of Viability
MacDonald and Committee on Fetus and Newborn
Pediatrics 2002;110:1024-1027.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Remodeling Health Care
Sprinkle
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1994;19:45-68.
ABSTRACT  

International Differences in the Use of Obstetric Interventions
Notzon
JAMA 1990;263:3286-3291.
ABSTRACT  

The Search for a Lower Cesarean Rate Goes On
Jonas and Dooley
JAMA 1989;262:1512-1513.
ABSTRACT