You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 262 No. 12, September 22, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (37)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Management of Infectious Waste by US Hospitals

William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH; LCDR Robert L. Odette; Gregory P. Samsa, PhD

JAMA. 1989;262(12):1635-1640.


Abstract

In July 1987 and January 1988, forty-six percent (441/955) of randomly selected US hospitals responded to a questionnaire intended to identify their waste disposal practices. Survey responses were received from hospitals in 48 states. United States hospitals generated a median of 6.93 kg of hospital waste per patient per day and infectious waste made up 15% of the total hospital waste. Most hospitals (>90%) considered blood, microbiology, "sharps," communicable disease isolation, pathology, autopsy, and contaminated animal carcass waste as infectious. Other sources of hospital waste that were commonly (>80%) designated infectious were surgical, dialysis, and miscellaneous laboratory waste. The infectious waste was normally (80%) treated via incineration or steam sterilization before disposal, whereas noninfectious waste was discarded directly in a sanitary landfill. Eighty-two percent of these US hospitals are discarding blood, microbiology, sharps, pathology, and contaminated animal carcass waste in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control's recommendations, while the compliance rate for the Environmental Protection Agency's recommendations (excluding optional waste) is 75%. No hospital could identify an infection problem (excluding needle-stick injuries) that was attributable to the disposal of infectious waste. While the management of infectious waste by US hospitals is generally consistent with the Centers for Disease Control's guidelines, many hospitals employ overly inclusive definitions of infectious waste.

(JAMA. 1989;262:1635-1640)



Author Affiliations

USN, MSPH, RS

From the Department of Hospital Epidemiology, North Carolina Memorial Hospital (Dr Rutala), Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine (Dr Rutala), and Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina (Mr Odette), Chapel Hill; and Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Field Program and Division of Biometry and Informatics, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (Dr Samsa). Mr Odette is now with the Board of Inspection and Survey, Atlantic, Naval Amphibious Base Little Creek, Norfolk, Va.


Footnotes

Presented in part at the 28th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Los Angeles, Calif, October 23-26, 1988.

Reprint requests to Division of Infectious Diseases, CB# 7030, 547 Burnett Womack Bldg, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7030 (Dr Rutala).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Hospital waste management in Brazil: A case study
Mattoso and Schalch
Waste Manag Res 2001;19:567-572.
ABSTRACT  

Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs: Biohazardous Waste Management: What the Physician Needs to Know
Cocchiarella et al.
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:26-29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Quantitative, Qualitative, and Critical Assessment of Surgical Waste: Surgeons Venture Through the Trash Can
Tieszen and Gruenberg
JAMA 1992;267:2765-2768.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.