You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 262 No. 24, December 22, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Application of Clinical Indicators in the Emergency Department

Margaret R. O'Leary, MD; Mark S. Smith, MD; Dennis S. O'Leary, MD; William W. Olmsted, MD; David J. Curtis, MD; Georgina Groleau, MD; Brent Mabey, MD

JAMA. 1989;262(24):3444-3447.


Abstract

Clinical indicators were developed and used to assess the quality of patient care resulting from the system of shared responsibility between emergency department (ED) and radiology department faculty physicians for interpretation of ED roentgenograms. The first indicator—all discrepancies in roentgenogram interpretation between ED and radiology department faculty—measured an overall discrepancy rate of 3.3% (776 films). Three hundred fifty-two apparent discrepancies were not related to the accuracy with which ED faculty interpreted films, resulting in a revised overall discrepancy rate of 1.8%. The second indicator— undesirable patient care outcomes as a result of delayed accurate radiological diagnosis—measured an occurrence rate of 0 after clinical reevaluation of more than 99% of patients within 24 hours of initial ED evaluation. Aspects of the development and use of clinical indicators are discussed in relationship to the broader monitoring and evaluating process necessary for the continuous improvement of patient care.

(JAMA. 1989;262:3444-3447)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Emergency Medicine (Drs M. R. O'Leary, Smith, Groleau, and Mabey) and Radiology (Drs Olmsted and Curtis), George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Chicago, III (Dr D. S. O'Leary). Dr M. R. O'Leary is now with the Department of Emergency Medicine, St Therese Medical Center, Waukegan, Ill, and the Department of Research and Development, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Chicago, Ill. Dr Groleau is now with the Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System Hospital, Baltimore. Dr Mabey is now with the Department of Emergency Medicine, Cottonwood Hospital Medical Center, Murray, Utah, and the Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Research and Development, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 875 N Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL 60611 (Dr M. R. O'Leary).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Radiographs in the Office: Is a Second Reading Always Needed?
Smith et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2004;17:256-263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chest radiographs in the emergency department: is the radiologist really necessary?
Gatt et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2003;79:214-217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.