You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 262 No. 3, July 21, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Economic Impact and Multiplier Effect of a Family Practice Clinic on an Academic Medical Center

Ronald Schneeweiss, MD; Kathleen Ellsbury, MD, MSPH; L. Gary Hart, PhD; John P. Geyman, MD

JAMA. 1989;262(3):370-375.


Abstract

Academic medical centers are facing the need to expand their primary care referral base in an increasingly competitive medical environment. This study describes the medical care provided during a 1-year period to 6304 patients registered with a family practice clinic located in an academic medical center. The relative distribution of primary care, secondary referrals, inpatient admissions, and their associated costs are presented. The multiplier effect of the primary care clinic on the academic medical center was substantial. For every $1 billed for ambulatory primary care, there was $6.40 billed elsewhere in the system. Each full-time equivalent family physician generated a calculated sum of $784 752 in direct, billed charges for the hospital and $241 276 in professional fees for the other specialty consultants. The cost of supporting a primary care clinic is likely to be more than offset by the revenues generated from the use of hospital and referral services by patients who received care in the primary care setting.

(JAMA. 1989;262:370-375)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Department of Family Medicine, HQ-30, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195(Dr Schneeweiss).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Referral of Children to Specialists in the United States and the United Kingdom
Forrest et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003;157:279-285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Length of Stay and Costs for Hospitalized Hemodialysis Patients: Nephrologists versus Internists
KSHIRSAGAR et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000;11:1526-1533.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is the Public being Protected? Prevention of Suboptimalmedical Practice Through Training Programs and Credentialing Examinations
Tamblyn
Eval Health Prof 1994;17:198-221.
ABSTRACT  

Health Care Reform, Primary Care, and the Need for Research
Franks et al.
JAMA 1993;270:1449-1453.
ABSTRACT  

Economic Incentives for Ethical and Courteous Behavior in Medicine: A Proposal
Erde
ANN INTERN MED 1990;113:790-793.
ABSTRACT  

The Economic Impact of a Primary Care Clinic
Kolodzik
JAMA 1989;262:2684-2684.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.