You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 262 No. 6, August 11, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  State of the Art/Review
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (70)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Calcium Entry Blockers in the Treatment of Hypertension

Current Status and Future Prospects

Norman M. Kaplan, MD

JAMA. 1989;262(6):817-823.


Abstract

Calcium entry blockers will be increasingly used for the treatment of hypertension. The currently available calcium entry blockers are similar in antihypertensive efficacy but differ in their effects on the atrioventricular node and the degree of peripheral vasodilatory action. The new generation of dihydropyridine calcium entry blockers exhibits more specific vasodilatory actions with a less negative inotropic effect, which may affect their use in patients with congestive heart failure. The responsiveness to these drugs is little affected by race or age. Because of their mild natriuretic action, the concomitant use of dietary sodium restriction or diuretics may be less necessary. Short-term administration of calcium entry blockers preserves or improves renal function; however, their long-term effect has not been documented. Calcium entry blockers have not exhibited protection against coronary heart disease, but experimental evidence supports the continued search for cardioprotection. Calcium entry blockers are important drugs for the treatment of hypertension; the second generation may provide additional benefits because of its more specific pharmacologic actions.

(JAMA. 1989;262:817-823)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235-8852 (Dr Kaplan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Fluid Matters in Choosing Antihypertensive Therapy: A Hypothesis That the Data Speak Volumes
Blankfield
J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:113-124.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hypertension and the Vascular Patient
Samson
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2004;38:103-119.
ABSTRACT  

Mibefradil Improves {beta}-Adrenergic Responsiveness and Intracellular Ca2+ Handling in Hypertrophied Rat Myocardium
Min et al.
Exp. Biol. Med. 2002;227:336-344.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antihypertensive Properties of the Novel Calcium Antagonist Mibefradil (Ro 40-5967) : A New Generation of Calcium Antagonists?
Bernink et al.
Hypertension 1996;27:426-432.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Calcium Antagonists in Elderly and Black Hypertensive Patients: Therapeutic Controversies
Zing et al.
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2154-2162.
ABSTRACT  

Drug-Induced Fever due to Diltiazem
Dominguez and Hamill
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1869-1870.
ABSTRACT  

Treatment of Hypertension in the Elderly
Tjoa and Kaplan
JAMA 1990;264:1015-1018.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.