This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Paul J. Friedman, MD

JAMA. 1990;263(10):1416-1419.

Abstract
To gain a better understanding of the problem of dealing with publications whose integrity is subsequently challenged, experience in a well-documented case of research fraud was reviewed. At the University of California San Diego, a faculty committee evaluated 135 publications of Robert Slutsky, MD, and reported to each of the corresponding 30 journals whether each article was valid, questionable, or fraudulent, requesting publication of the criteria and the conclusions. Journals responded slowly to this request; half required additional letters over a 2-year period to elicit a reply. Of the 13 journals that had only valid articles, 5 printed a statement to that effect. Statements concerning 46 of 60 nonvalid articles were eventually published. Journals' inconsistent identification of published statements made it difficult to retrieve them by electronic searching. Only 7 notices covering 15 articles were found by searching under the Medical Subject Heading "Retraction of Publication"; scanning the entire bibliography retrieved 18 articles with retraction notations. A poll showed that journals rarely have written procedures for responding to allegations of research misconduct; in our experience, journals were reluctant to accept authorized retractions or corrections when coauthors failed to act.

(JAMA. 1990;263:1416-1419)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego.

Footnotes
Presented in part at the Conference on Ethics and Policy in Scientific Publication, sponsored by the Council of Biology Editors, Washington, DC, October 17, 1988; and at The First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Chicago, Ill, May 10-12, 1989.

Reprint requests to 5644 Soledad Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037 (Dr Friedman).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reporting Research, Retraction of Results, and Responsibility
Tobin
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000;162:773-774.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Trials in the Spotlight
Blayney
The Oncologist 1999;4:348-351.
FULL TEXT  

Research misconduct and redundant publication
RAJAGOPALAN
Gut 1998;42:448c-448.
FULL TEXT  

THE TECHNOLOGICAL OBSOLESCENCE OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
Feigenbaum and Levy
Rationality and Society 1996;8:261-276.
ABSTRACT  

Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud
Lock
BMJ 1995;310:1547-1547.
FULL TEXT  

Publication of Research: The Ethical Dimension
Lynch
JDR 1994;73:1778-1782.
ABSTRACT  

Scientific Misconduct in Environmental Science and Toxicology
Nigg and Radulescu
JAMA 1994;272:168-170.
ABSTRACT  

The Scientific Community's Response to Evidence of Fraudulent Publication: The Robert Slutsky Case
Whitely et al.
JAMA 1994;272:170-173.
ABSTRACT