You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 263 No. 16, April 25, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Concepts in Emergency and Critical Care
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Changing Attitudes and Practices in Forgoing Life-Sustaining Treatments

Charles L. Sprung, MD, JD

JAMA. 1990;263(16):2211-2215.


Abstract

Advances in medical technology and practices have been associated with improved patient outcomes. At times, the price of this progress has included great financial costs and human suffering. During the last two decades, there have been significant changes in medical practices in America. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the removal of a respirator or hydration or nutrition from a patient who was not brain dead was considered a deviation from accepted medical practices. In 1976, the Quinlan case allowed the removal of a ventilator from a patient in a persistent vegetative state. Subsequent court decisions in the 1980s have equated hydration and artificial feeding with other forms of life-sustaining treatments and have allowed their withdrawal in patients who were not terminally ill. Prominent physicians have recently stated that it is not immoral for a physician to assist in the rational suicide of a terminally ill patient. Active euthanasia programs in the United States are likely in the near future.

(JAMA. 1990;263:2211-2215)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center and University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla, and the Department of Anesthesiology, Hadassah University Hospital and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Anesthesiology, Hadassah University Hospital, PO Box 12000, 91120 Jerusalem, Israel (Dr Sprung).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluation of Changes in Forgoing Life-Sustaining Treatment in Israeli ICU Patients
Jakobson et al.
Chest 2004;126:1969-1973.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determinants in Canadian Health Care Workers of the Decision to Withdraw Life Support From the Critically Ill
Cook et al.
JAMA 1995;273:703-708.
ABSTRACT  

Advance Directives: Effect of Type of Directive on Physicians' Therapeutic Decisions
Mower and Baraff
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:375-381.
ABSTRACT  

Decisions Near the End of Life
Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs et al.
JAMA 1992;267:2229-2233.
ABSTRACT  

Road to Euthanasia or Right to Refuse Care?
Rouse
JAMA 1990;264:1809-1809.
ABSTRACT  

Road to Euthanasia or Right to Refuse Care?
Sananman
JAMA 1990;264:1809-1809.
ABSTRACT  

Comparative Ethics and Geriatric Psychiatry: Looking at Motivations
Primeau
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1990;3:231-236.
ABSTRACT  

The Road to Euthanasia
Carton
JAMA 1990;263:2221-2221.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.