You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 263 No. 3, January 19, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Council Report
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Persistent Vegetative State and the Decision to Withdraw or Withhold Life Support

Council on Scientific Affairs and Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs

JAMA. 1990;263(3):426-430.


Abstract

Persons with overwhelming damage to the cerebral hemispheres commonly pass into a chronic state of unconsciousness (ie, loss of self-awareness) called the vegetative state. When such cognitive loss lasts for more than a few weeks, the condition has been termed a persistent vegetative state, because the body retains the functions necessary to sustain vegetative functions. Recovery from the vegetative state does occur, but many persons in persistent vegetative states live for months or years if provided with nutritional and other supportive measures. The withdrawal of life support from these persons with loss of higher brain function is a controversial issue, as highlighted by public debates and judicial decisions. This article provides criteria for the diagnosis of permanent unconsciousness and reviews the available data that support the reliability of these criteria. Significant legal decisions have been made with regard to withdrawal of life support to patients in persistent vegetative states, and the trends in this area are discussed.

(JAMA. 1990;263:426-430)



Author Affiliations

From the Council on Scientific Affairs and the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill.


Footnotes

This report was presented to the American Medical Association House of Delegates in June 1989 and was filed for information as a report of the Council on Scientific Affairs and the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.

This report is not intended to be construed or to serve as a standard of medical care. Standards of medical care are determined on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances involved in an individual case and are subject to change as scientific knowledge and technology advance and patterns of practice evolve. This report reflects the views of scientific literature as of June 1989.

Reprint requests to Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610 (William R. Hendee, PhD).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Neurologic prognosis and withdrawal of life support after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
Geocadin et al.
Neurology 2006;67:105-108.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition
Bernat and Beresford
Neurology 2006;66:1618-1619.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Diagnosis of Prolonged States of Impaired Consciousness in Adults
Wijdicks and Cranford
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:1037-1046.
ABSTRACT  

Ethics Manual: Fifth Edition
Snyder et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:560-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Withdrawing Nutrition and Hydration from Children: Legal, Ethical, and Professional Issues
Levi
CLIN PEDIATR 2003;42:139-145.
 

Ethical Conflicts Between Residents and Attending Physicians
Levi
CLIN PEDIATR 2002;41:659-667.
ABSTRACT  

Late Improvement in Consciousness after Post-Traumatic Vegetative State
Childs and Mercer
NEJM 1996;334:24-25.
FULL TEXT  

Forgoing Medically Provided Nutrition and Hydration in Pediatric Patients
Nelson et al.
J Law Med Ethics 1995;23:33-46.
 

Medical Aspects of the Persistent Vegetative State- First of Two Parts
The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS
NEJM 1994;330:1499-1508.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethics Consultants' Recommendations for Life-Prolonging Treatment of Patients in a Persistent Vegetative State
Fox and Stocking
JAMA 1993;270:2578-2582.
ABSTRACT  

An Ethical Analysis of the Use of 'Futility' in the 1992 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac Care
Jecker and Schneiderman
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2195-2198.
ABSTRACT  

Practical Problems in the Withdrawal of Nutrition and Hydration From Two Patients in a Persistent Vegetative State
Richardson and Keay
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:981-986.
ABSTRACT  

Brain Death
Spudis
Arch Neurol 1993;50:132-132.
ABSTRACT  

Ethical Considerations in Resuscitation
JAMA 1992;268:2282-2288.
ABSTRACT  

Brain Death: Occurs Only With Destruction of the Cerebral Hemispheres and the Brain Stem
Bernat
Arch Neurol 1992;49:569-570.
ABSTRACT  

Special Ethical Issues in the Management of PVS Patients
Brody
J Law Med Ethics 1992;20:104-115.
 

Managing Ethical Issues in Nutrition Support of Terminally Ill Patients
Gallagher-Allred
Nutr Clin Pract 1991;6:113-116.
ABSTRACT  

Why Withdrawal of Life-Support for PVS Patients Is Not a Family Decision
Baron
J Law Med Ethics 1991;19:73-75.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.