You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 263 No. 5, February 2, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (170)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Does Inappropriate Use Explain Small-Area Variations in the Use of Health Care Services?

Lucian L. Leape, MD; Rolla Edward Park, PhD; David H. Solomon, MD; Mark R. Chassin, MD, MPP, MPH; Jacqueline Kosecoff, PhD; Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD

JAMA. 1990;263(5):669-672.


Abstract

We studied the relationship of the appropriateness of the use of coronary angiography, carotid endarterectomy, and upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy to their rates of use in 23 adjacent counties in one state. We measured appropriateness by means of a detailed review of the medical records of Medicare beneficiaries who had the procedures performed in 1981, using preset criteria derived by an expert panel. Use rates per 10 000 Medicare enrollees in a county varied from 13 to 158 for coronary angiography, 5 to 41 for carotid endarterectomy, and 42 to 164 for upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy. Inappropriate use varied by county from 8% to 75% for coronary angiography, from 0% to 67% for carotid endarterectomy, and from 0% to 25% for endoscopy. For coronary angiography, inappropriate use accounted for 28% of the variance in the county rate. For the other two procedures, no significant correlations were found between inappropriateness of use and rate of use. We conclude that little of the variation in the rates of use of these procedures can be explained by inappropriate use.

(JAMA. 1990;263:669-672)



Author Affiliations

From the Health Sciences Program of The RAND Corporation (Drs Leape, Park, and Brook) and Value Health Sciences Inc (Drs Chassin and Kosecoff), Santa Monica, Calif: and the Departments of Medicine (Drs Solomon and Brook) and Public Health (Dr Brook), University of California at Los Angeles. Dr Leape is now with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.


Footnotes

The opinions, conclusions, and proposals herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the supporting organization, The RAND Corporation, or the University of California.

Reprint requests to The RAND Corporation, 1700 Main St, Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90406 (Dr Brook).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Appropriateness of Imaging: A Comprehensive Conceptual Framework
Sistrom
Radiology 2009;251:637-649.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Principles for the Development and Use of Quality Measures
Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Mana
Pediatrics 2008;121:411-418.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Spending More Always Wasteful? The Appropriateness Of Care And Outcomes Among Colorectal Cancer Patients
Landrum et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:159-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Geographic Variation In The Appropriate Use Of Cesarean Delivery
Baicker et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:w355-w367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will Volume-Based Referral Strategies Reduce Costs Or Just Save Lives?
Birkmeyer et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:234-241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Geographic Variation In The Use Of Medications: Is Uniformity Good News Or Bad?
Dubois et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:240-250.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Geographic Variation in the Rate of Carotid Endarterectomy in Canada Editorial Comment
Feasby et al.
Stroke 2001;32:2417-2422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Life: Erosions and Opportunities Under Managed Care
Morreim
J Law Med Ethics 2000;28:144-158.
 

ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
Scanlon et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756-1824.
FULL TEXT  

Comparing Generalist and Specialty Care: Discrepancies, Deficiencies, and Excesses
Donohoe
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1596-1608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What is Appropriate Care?
Naylor
NEJM 1998;338:1918-1920.
FULL TEXT  

Commentary
Kane
Med Care Res Rev 1997;54:321-325.
 

Managed Care, Managing Uncertainty
Mirvis and Chang
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:385-388.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines in Pediatric and Newborn Medicine: Implications for Their Use in Practice
Merritt et al.
Pediatrics 1997;99:100-114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Payment by Capitation and the Quality of Care- Part Five of Six
Berwick
NEJM 1996;335:1227-1231.
FULL TEXT  

The Ethics of Practice Guidelines
Berger and Rosner
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2051-2056.
ABSTRACT  

The Association Between Local Diagnostic Testing Intensity and Invasive Cardiac Procedures
Wennberg et al.
JAMA 1996;275:1161-1164.
ABSTRACT  

Regional Variation across the United States in the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Pilote et al.
NEJM 1995;333:565-572.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Practice Profiling: Concepts and Caveats
Brand et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1995;52:223-251.
ABSTRACT  

Creating Practice Guidelines: The Dangers of Over-Reliance on Expert Judgment
Kane
J Law Med Ethics 1995;23:62-64.
 

Variations in Pediatric Pneumonia and Bronchitis/Asthma Admission Rates: Is Appropriateness a Factor?
Payne et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:162-169.
ABSTRACT  

Costs vs Quality in Different Types of Primary Care Settings
Starfield et al.
JAMA 1994;272:1903-1908.
ABSTRACT  

Eleven Worthy Aims for Clinical Leadership of Health System Reform
Berwick
JAMA 1994;272:797-802.
ABSTRACT  

Cataract Guidelines: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Javitt
Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:589-589.
 

The Methodologic Foundations of Studies of the Appropriateness of Medical Care
Phelps
NEJM 1993;329:1241-1245.
FULL TEXT  

The Association between On-Site Cardiac Catheterization Facilities and the Use of Coronary Angiography after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Every et al.
NEJM 1993;329:546-551.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mechanical Ventilation for the Elderly Patient in Intensive Care: Incremental Charges and Benefits
Cohen et al.
JAMA 1993;269:1025-1029.
ABSTRACT  

Truth's Search for Power in Health Policy: Critical Applications to Community-Oriented Primary Care and Small Area Analysis
Waitzkin and Hubbell
Med Care Res Rev 1992;49:161-189.
 

Further Issues in Small Area Variations Analysis
Stano
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1991;16:573-588.
ABSTRACT  

Variations in Length of Stay and Outcomes for Six Medical and Surgical Conditions in Massachusetts and California
Cleary et al.
JAMA 1991;266:73-79.
ABSTRACT  

Coronary Angiography after Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Topol et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1991;114:877-885.
ABSTRACT  

Practice Guidelines: A New Reality in Medicine: I. Recent Developments
Woolf
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1811-1818.
ABSTRACT  

Variation and Inappropriateness Are Not the Same
Mark
JAMA 1990;263:3149-3150.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.