This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Randall S. Stafford, PhD

JAMA. 1990;263(5):683-687.

Abstract
Cesarean section rates in the United States have increased from 5.5% in 1970 to 24.4% in 1987. This dramatic increase has generated considerable concern, leading to a variety of proposals to control rising use of cesarean section. Six strategies have been adopted or proposed to reduce cesarean section use: (1) education and peer evaluation, (2) external review, (3) public dissemination of cesarean section rates, (4) changes in physician payment, (5) changes in hospital payment, and (6) medical malpractice reform. These strategies differ in their specific assumptions regarding the process of clinical decision making, implications for physician autonomy, and methods of implementation. Educational efforts have been the most widely promoted. Of these, formal programs aimed at modifying practices within individual hospitals appear to be the most successful. However, insufficient research has been conducted to compare conclusively the impact and feasibility of these six strategies, pointing to the need for further study.

(JAMA. 1990;263:683-687)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Biomedical and Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health.

Footnotes
Presented in part at the 1989 Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, Chicago, Ill, October 25,1989.

Reprint requests to the Department of Biomedical and Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, 140 Warren Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 (Dr Stafford).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of a clinical practice guideline on physician compliance
Suwanrath-Kengpol et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:327-332.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review: previous caesarean delivery or abortion increases the risk of placenta praevia
Shorten
Evid. Based Nurs. 1998;1:85-85.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of Risk-Adjusting Cesarean Delivery Rates When Reporting Hospital Performance
Aron et al.
JAMA 1998;279:1968-1972.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trial of Labor or Repeated Cesarean Section: The Woman's Choice
Roberts et al.
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:120-125.
ABSTRACT  

Equalizing Physician Fees had Little Effect on Cesarean Rates
Keeler and Fok
Med Care Res Rev 1996;53:465-471.
ABSTRACT  

Painful vs Painless Cost Control
Grumbach and Bodenheimer
JAMA 1994;272:1458-1464.
ABSTRACT  

Socioeconomic Factors and the Odds of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery
King and Lahiri
JAMA 1994;272:524-529.
ABSTRACT  

Continuous Emotional Support During Labor in a US Hospital: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kennell et al.
JAMA 1991;265:2197-2201.
ABSTRACT  

Cesarean Section Rates-Reply
Stafford
JAMA 1991;265:595-596.
ABSTRACT  

The Impact of Nonclinical Factors on Repeat Cesarean Section
Stafford
JAMA 1991;265:59-63.
ABSTRACT