You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 263 No. 5, February 2, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Toward Optimal Laboratory Use
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (52)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Critical Limits for Urgent Clinician Notification at US Medical Centers

Gerald J. Kost, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1990;263(5):704-707.


Abstract

A national survey determined critical limits used by trauma and medical centers in the United States. Mean low and high critical limits for the most frequently listed tests were the following values: glucose, 2.6 and 26.9 mmol/L; potassium, 2.8 and 6.2 mmol/L; calcium, 1.65 and 3.22 mmol/L; sodium, 120 and 158 mmol/L; hematocrit, 0.18 and 0.61; hemoglobin, 66 and 199 g/L; platelets, 37 x 109/L and 910x109/L; and white blood cell count, 2.0x109/L and 37.0x109/L. The high critical limit for prothrombin time was 27 seconds. Critical limits for Pco2 were 19 and 67 mm Hg; and forpH, 7.21 and 7.59. The low critical limit for Po2 was 43 mm Hg; no high critical limit was listed. The noncritical span for free calcium was 0.80 mmol/L. Important qualitative critical results included the presence of blasts on the blood smear, a Gram's stain or culture from blood or cerebrospinal fluid with positive results, and an elevated white blood cell count in the cerebrospinal fluid. A product of 15 years of collective medical judgment, these data should help physicians improve the quality and efficiency of acute patient care.

(JAMA. 1990;263:704-707)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Clinical Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Clinical Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 (Dr Kost).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Urgent Clinician Notification of Low Hemoglobin Values
Froom et al.
Clin. Chem. 2001;47:63-66.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Response to Critical Laboratory Results with Automation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Kuperman et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1999;6:512-522.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Promptly Are Inpatients Treated for Critical Laboratory Results?
Kuperman et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1998;5:112-119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thoughts on quality-control systems: a laboratorian's perspective
Cembrowski
Clin. Chem. 1997;43:886-892.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laboratory Critical Limits
Fine
JAMA 1990;264:335-335.
ABSTRACT  

Laboratory Critical Limits-Reply
Kost
JAMA 1990;264:335-335.
ABSTRACT  

Critical (Panic) Value Notification: An Established Laboratory Practice Policy (Parameter)
Lundberg
JAMA 1990;263:709-709.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.