You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 264 No. 22, December 12, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tubal Sterilization and the Long-term Risk of Hysterectomy

Andy Stergachis, PhD; Kirkwood K. Shy, MD, MPH; Louis C. Grothaus, MS; Edward H. Wagner, MD, MPH; Julia A. Hecht, PhD, MPH; Garnet Anderson, PhD; Esther H. Normand, RRA; Janet Raboud, MS

JAMA. 1990;264(22):2893-2898.


Abstract

To assess the effect of tubal sterilization on the risk of hysterectomy, we studied 7414 women aged 20 to 49 years who had had a tubal sterilization at a health maintenance organization between January 1, 1968, and December 31,1983. Compared with a population-based cohort of nonsterilized women, women sterilized while 20 to 29 years old were 3.4 times more likely to have had a subsequent hysterectomy (95% confidence interval, 2.4 to 4.7). Adjustment for the effects of potential confounders with a subset of 276 women did not appreciably alter this association. For multivariate comparisons with 5323 wives of vasectomized men, there was no significant elevation in the risk of hysterectomy following sterilization among women sterilized while 20 to 29 years old. Tubal sterilization was not associated with hysterectomy for married women who underwent tubal sterilization at age 30 or older. These results do not support a biological basis for the relationship between tubal sterilization and hysterectomy.

(JAMA. 1990;264:2893-2898)



Author Affiliations

From the Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (Drs Stergachis, Wagner, and Hecht, Mr Grothaus, and Ms Normand), and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr Shy) and Biostatistics (Dr Anderson and Ms Raboud), University of Washington, Seattle.; Dr Stergachis is now with the Departments of Pharmacy and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle. Ms Raboud is now with the University of Toronto (Ontario). Dr Anderson is now with the Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Program in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Policy, School of Pharmacy, SC-69, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 (Dr Stergachis).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

What We Tell Our Daughters and Ourselves About Hysterectomy
Davis
Qualitative Inquiry 2009;15:1303-1337.
ABSTRACT  

Tubal Sterilization and Subsequent Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case-Control Study
Holt et al.
JAMA 1991;266:242-246.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.