 |
 |

Length of Stay in the Intensive Care UnitEffects of Practice Guidelines and Feedback
Kim A. Eagle, MD;
Albert G. Mulley, MD;
Steven J. Skates, PhD;
Victoria A. Reder, MPH;
Britain W. Nicholson, MD;
Jayne O. Sexton, RN;
G. Octo Barnett, MD;
George E. Thibault, MD
JAMA. 1990;264(8):992-997.
Abstract
 |  |
We developed consensus management guidelines for patients admitted with chest pain, pulmonary edema, and syncope and used these guidelines to examine practice variation and the effects of physician feedback on decision making in 1145 consecutive admissions to three medical intensive care units. Data collection included a 6-month baseline period and two 6-month physician feedback periods. Hospital length of stay fell from 8.34 days to 7.41 and 7.14 days during feedback; intensive care unit length of stay fell from 2.45 days to 2.23 and 2.07 days. Feedback was associated with an increase in the percentage of patients conforming to the management guidelines. Multiple linear regression showed that feedback correlated with reductions of 0.79 days (confidence interval, 0.12 to 1.46) in hospital length of stay and 0.21 days (confidence interval 0.05 to 0.37) in intensive care unit length of stay. This effect was most apparent in patients not requiring any intervention, but with a major complication. During the 6-month follow-up, mortality, readmission, and urgent readmission rates were similar for patients admitted in baseline and feedback periods.
(JAMA. 1990;264:992-997)
Author Affiliations
From the Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Drs Eagle, Mulley, Skates, Nicholson, and Barnett and Mss Reder and Sexton); and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Roxbury, Mass (Dr Thibault).
Footnotes
Reprint requests to Cardiac and General Medicine Units. Massachusetts General Hospital, Bulfinch 1, Boston, MA 02114 (Dr Eagle).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Factors influencing length of stay in the intensive care unit.
Gruenberg et al.
Am J Crit Care 2006;15:502-509.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Improving the ICU: Part 2
Garland
Chest 2005;127:2165-2179.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Using Information Technology To Improve the Health Care of Older Adults
Weiner et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:430-436.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A prospective study of prolonged stay in the intensive care unit: predictors and impact on resource utilization
ARABI et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14:403-410.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluating Quality of Care for Patients With Heart Failure
Krumholz et al.
Circulation 2000;101
:e122-e140.
FULL TEXT
Integrated care pathways
Campbell et al.
BMJ 1998;316:133-137.
FULL TEXT
Attributes of ATS documents that guide clinical practice. Recommendations of the ATS Clinical Practice Committee
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997;156:2015-2025.
FULL TEXT
Health Care Quality: Incorporating Consumer Perspectives
Cleary and Edgman-Levitan
JAMA 1997;278:1608-1612.
ABSTRACT
Prediction of the Need for Intensive Care in Patients Who Come to Emergency Departments with Acute Chest Pain
Goldman et al.
NEJM 1996;334:1498-1504.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Temporary Firms in Community Hospitals: Elements of a Managerial Theory of Clinical Efficiency
Chilingerian and Glavin
Med Care Res Rev 1994;51:289-335.
Practice Guidelines: A New Reality in Medicine: III. Impact on Patient Care
Woolf
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2646-2655.
ABSTRACT
|