You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 264 No. 8, August 22, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Length of stay in the intensive care unit. Effects of practice guidelines and feedback

K. A. Eagle, A. G. Mulley, S. J. Skates, V. A. Reder, B. W. Nicholson, J. O. Sexton, G. O. Barnett and G. E. Thibault
Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

We developed consensus management guidelines for patients admitted with chest pain, pulmonary edema, and syncope and used these guidelines to examine practice variation and the effects of physician feedback on decision making in 1145 consecutive admissions to three medical intensive care units. Data collection included a 6-month baseline period and two 6-month physician feedback periods. Hospital length of stay fell from 8.34 days to 7.41 and 7.14 days during feedback; intensive care unit length of stay fell from 2.45 days to 2.23 and 2.07 days. Feedback was associated with an increase in the percentage of patients conforming to the management guidelines. Multiple linear regression showed that feedback correlated with reductions of 0.79 days (confidence interval, 0.12 to 1.46) in hospital length of stay and 0.21 days (confidence interval 0.05 to 0.37) in intensive care unit length of stay. This effect was most apparent in patients not requiring any intervention, but with a major complication. During the 6-month follow-up, mortality, readmission, and urgent readmission rates were similar for patients admitted in baseline and feedback periods.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors influencing length of stay in the intensive care unit.
Gruenberg et al.
Am J Crit Care 2006;15:502-509.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the ICU: Part 2
Garland
Chest 2005;127:2165-2179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using Information Technology To Improve the Health Care of Older Adults
Weiner et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:430-436.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A prospective study of prolonged stay in the intensive care unit: predictors and impact on resource utilization
ARABI et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14:403-410.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluating Quality of Care for Patients With Heart Failure
Krumholz et al.
Circulation 2000;101 :e122-e140.
FULL TEXT  

Integrated care pathways
Campbell et al.
BMJ 1998;316:133-137.
FULL TEXT  

Attributes of ATS documents that guide clinical practice. Recommendations of the ATS Clinical Practice Committee
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997;156:2015-2025.
FULL TEXT  

Prediction of the Need for Intensive Care in Patients Who Come to Emergency Departments with Acute Chest Pain
Goldman et al.
NEJM 1996;334:1498-1504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Temporary Firms in Community Hospitals: Elements of a Managerial Theory of Clinical Efficiency
Chilingerian and Glavin
Med Care Res Rev 1994;51:289-335.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.