You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 265 No. 1, January 2, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Barrier Contraceptive Methods and Preeclampsia

James L. Mills, MD, MS; Mark A. Klebanoff, MD, MPH; Barry I. I. Graubard, MA; J. Christopher Carey, MD; Heinz W. Berendes, MD, MHS

JAMA. 1991;265(1):70-73.


Abstract

Recent investigations have suggested that women who use barrier methods of contraception may be at increased risk for preeclampsia. We used data from two prospective pregnancy studies to examine the relationship between contraceptive use before conception and preeclampsia. The preeclampsia rates among women using barrier contraceptives were not significantly higher than the rates in women using nonbarrier contraceptives or the rates in women using no contraceptives in either study. The odds ratios for preeclampsia in barrier contraceptive users in the two studies were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.12) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.45) compared with nonbarrier contraceptive users and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.16) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.35) compared with women using no contraceptives. After adjusting for other risk factors, we found no association between preeclampsia and barrier contraceptive use. Additional studies are needed to resolve this issue; however, we would recommend that women not be advised to avoid barrier contraceptives unless more data linking their use to preeclampsia appear.

(JAMA. 1991;265:70-73)



Author Affiliations

From the Prevention Research Program, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Drs Mills, Klebanoff, Carey, and Berendes), and the National Cancer Institute (Mr Graubard), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Prevention Research Program, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, EPN Bldg, Room 640, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Dr Mills).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Long-term sexual co-habitation offers no protection from hypertensive disease of pregnancy
Hall et al.
Hum Reprod 2001;16:349-352.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.