You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 265 No. 19, May 15, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Health Insurance Values and Implementation in the Netherlands and the Federal Republic of Germany

An Alternative Path to Universal Coverage

Bradford L. Kirkman-Liff, DrPH

JAMA. 1991;265(19):2496-2502.


Abstract

The health care systems in the Netherlands and the Federal Republic of Germany are based on a set of values that involve mutual obligations between private parties. These obligations are realized through systems incorporating private practice physicians, community and church- and municipality-affiliated hospitals, and nonprofit and for-profit insurers. The underlying values and implementation approaches in these systems provide an alternative to the adoption of a Canadian-style health insurance system. A discussion that focuses on "obligations" rather than "rights" may be a more useful approach for the design of reforms of the American health system in the 1990s. Such a discussion would focus on the mutual responsibility of all parties to create and maintain a universal private health care system.

(JAMA. 1991;265:2496-2502)



Author Affiliations

From the School of Health Administration and Policy, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, and Department of Health Care Policy and Management, College of Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.


Footnotes

The views expressed are the author's own and not necessarily those of any of the sources of support.

Reprint requests to School of Health Administration and Policy, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4506 (Dr Kirkman-Liff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The German Health System: Lessons for Reform in the United States
Jackson
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:155-160.
ABSTRACT  

Opinions of Dutch Physicians, Nurses, and Citizens on Health Care Policy, Rationing, and Technology
Tymstra and Andela
JAMA 1993;270:2995-2999.
ABSTRACT  

Federalism and Health Care Reform
GROGAN
American Behavioral Scientist 1993;36:741-759.
ABSTRACT  

US Health Care Reform and the Economy of Prevention
Gellert
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:563-567.
ABSTRACT  

Financing Universal Health Insurance: Taxes, Premiums, and the Lessons of Social Insurance
Bodenheimer and Grumbach
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1992;17:439-462.
ABSTRACT  

The Netherlands Introduces Some Competition Into the Health Services
Schrijvers
JAMA 1991;266:2215-2217.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.