You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 265 No. 21, June 5, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Obstetrics and Malpractice

Evidence on the Performance of a Selective No-Fault System

Randall R. Bovbjerg, JD; Laurence R. Tancredi, MD, JD; Daniel S. Gaylin

JAMA. 1991;265(21):2836-2843.


Abstract

Most malpractice litigation in obstetrics could be replaced with an alternative insurance system based on "accelerated-compensation events," which are classes of medical injuries determined in advance by medical experts to be readily identifiable, normally preventable with good care, and nondistorting of medical decision making. This professionally derived system would help prevent injury and improve the resolution of injuries. Prior work on accelerated-compensation events was largely conceptual, so to study the likely effects of accelerated-compensation events, we applied the events to a large database of obstetrical malpractice claims. Results refute prior criticisms. Accelerated-compensation events (1) are definitely feasible to develop and apply, (2) would probably cover two thirds of currently paid claims and three quarters of indemnity dollars, (3) would likely involve substantial savings in time and expense per case, and (4) would probably not introduce an unmanageable number of large new claims.

(JAMA. 1991;265:2836-2843)



Author Affiliations

From The Urban Institute, Washington, DC (Messrs Bovbjerg and Gaylin), and the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Dr Tancredi).


Footnotes

Address reprint requests to The Urban Institute, 2100 M St NW, Washington, DC 20037 (Mr Bovbjerg).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medical Malpractice
Studdert et al.
NEJM 2004;350:283-292.
FULL TEXT  

Malpractice Reform in the 1990s: Past Disappointments, Future Success?
Kinney
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1995;20:99-135.
ABSTRACT  

The Influence of Standard of Care and Severity of Injury on the Resolution of Medical Malpractice Claims
Taragin et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1992;117:780-784.
ABSTRACT  

Medical Injury Compensation A Time for Testing New Approaches
Wadlington
JAMA 1991;265:2861-2861.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.