You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 265 No. 22, June 12, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (48)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Biased Estimates of Expected Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality Using Medis-Groups Admission Severity Groups

Mark S. Blumberg, MD

JAMA. 1991;265(22):2965-2970.


Abstract

This study examines whether the Medis-Groups admission severity groups give unbiased estimates of 30-day mortality in 3037 Medicare-aged patients who were hospitalized in 1985 through 1986 with acute myocardial infarction. The average observed death rate for all acute myocardial infarction patients in the study who were in a given admission severity group was used to estimate the expected death probability for each case in a given group. (This is the same method used by the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council for risk adjusting hospital mortality by diagnosis related groups in that state.) When compared with observed deaths, estimates of expected mortality were significantly biased for many patient attributes (eg, age, location of acute myocardial infarction, history of congestive heart failure, serum potassium level, serum urea nitrogen level, pulse rate, and blood pressure). These results are consistent with a conclusion that the MedisGroups scoring algorithm omits some important risk variables, inappropriately includes some other variables reflecting postadmission status, and gives the wrong weights to some appropriate risk variables. To the extent that these findings are also applicable to current MedisGroups scoring algorithms and to other conditions and procedures, MedisGroups admission severity groups cannot fairly adjust for interhospital case mix differences in outcome studies.

(JAMA. 1991;265:2965-2970)



Author Affiliations

From Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Oakland, Calif.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, One Kaiser Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612 (Dr Blumberg).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Research Evidence on the Validity of Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rate as a Measure of Hospital Quality of Care
Thomas and Hofer
Med Care Res Rev 1998;55:371-404.
ABSTRACT  

Pennsylvania's Focus on Heart Attack -- Grading the Scorecard
Jollis and Romano
NEJM 1998;338:983-987.
FULL TEXT  

Mortality and Length of Stay in Teaching vs Nonteaching Hospitals
Blumberg
JAMA 1997;278:2062-2062.
ABSTRACT  

Declines in Hospital Mortality Associated with a Regional Initiative to Measure Hospital Performance
Rosenthal et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1997;12:103-112.
ABSTRACT  

Analysis and Comparison of Operator-Specific Outcomes in Interventional Cardiology : From a Multicenter Database of 4860 Quality-Controlled Procedures
Ellis et al.
Circulation 1996;93:431-439.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of the Complication Rate as a Measure of Quality of Care in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Silber et al.
JAMA 1995;274:317-323.
ABSTRACT  

Risk Adjustment Methods Can Affect Perceptions of Outcomes
Iezzoni et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1994;9:43-48.
ABSTRACT  

Variation in Practice for Discretionary Admissions: Impact on Estimates of Quality of Hospital Care
Miller et al.
JAMA 1994;271:1493-1498.
ABSTRACT  

The Use and Abuse of Practice Profiles
Kassirer
NEJM 1994;330:634-636.
FULL TEXT  

Can Administrative Data be Used to Compare the Quality of Health Care?
Romano
Med Care Res Rev 1993;50:451-477.
 

A Measure of Mortality Risk for Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Van Ruiswyk et al.
Med Decis Making 1993;13:152-160.
ABSTRACT  

Relationship Between Malpractice Claims and Cesarean Delivery
Localio et al.
JAMA 1993;269:366-373.
ABSTRACT  

Bias Estimates of Mortality Using Medis-Groups
Brewster and Throop
JAMA 1991;266:2704-2704.
ABSTRACT  

Bias Estimates of Mortality Using MedisGroups
Hartz and Van Ruiswyk
JAMA 1991;266:2704-2705.
ABSTRACT  

'Black Box' Medical Information Systems: A Technology Needing Assessment
Iezzoni
JAMA 1991;265:3006-3007.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.