You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 265 No. 24, June 26, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (65)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Epidemiology of Rh Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn in the United States

Gilberto F. Chávez, MD, MPH; Joseph Mulinare, MD, MSPH; Larry D. Edmonds, MSPH

JAMA. 1991;265(24):3270-3274.


Abstract

Nationwide surveillance of Rh hemolytic disease of the newborn (RhHDN) indicates that, after a substantial decline in incidence, reported rates reached a plateau in the late 1970s. We conducted a study designed to validate RhHDN surveillance data, to obtain corrected incidence estimates, and to identify potential reasons for the reported plateau. We obtained data from the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, a national surveillance system that collects data from public and private hospitals participating voluntarily. We asked hospitals for copies of the medical records for all infants discharged with a code for RhHDN and for a sample of the medical records of infants discharged with a code for other and unspecified hemolytic disease during 1986. The estimated incidence rate of RhHDN was 10.6 per 10 000 total births, with some regional variations. Our findings indicate that, despite the availability of an effective preventive measure, RhHDN continues to contribute significantly to infant morbidity and mortality in the United States.

(JAMA. 1991;265:3270-3274)



Author Affiliations

From the Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases Branch, Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Center for Environmental Health and Injury Control, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga. Dr Chavez is presently with the Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control, on assignment to the Maternal and Child Health Branch of the California Department of Health Services, Sacramento.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS-F37, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Mr Edmonds).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Haemolytic disease of the newborn due to anti-c
Abourazzak et al.
BMJ Case Reports 2009;2009:bcr0920080987-bcr0920080987.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determination of RhD Zygosity: Comparison of a Double Amplification Refractory Mutation System Approach and a Multiplex Real-Time Quantitative PCR Approach
Chiu et al.
Clin. Chem. 2001;47:667-672.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neurodevelopmental Abnormalities and Schizophrenia: A Family Affair
Wyatt
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:11-15.
ABSTRACT  

The New and the Old -- Molecular Diagnostics and Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn
Luban
NEJM 1993;329:658-660.
FULL TEXT  

Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn: Lowest Achievable Incidence Rates
Hensleigh
JAMA 1991;266:2562-2562.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.