You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 12, September 25, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Estimating an individual's true cholesterol level and response to intervention

L. Irwig, P. Glasziou, A. Wilson and P. Macaskill
Department of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

An individual's blood cholesterol measurement may differ from the true level because of short-term biological and technical measurement variability. Using data on the within-individual and population variance of serum cholesterol, we addressed the following clinical concerns: Given a cholesterol measurement, what is the individual's likely true level? The confidence interval for the true level is wide and asymmetrical around extreme measurements because of regression to the mean. Of particular concern is the misclassification of people with a screening measurement below 5.2 mmol/L who may be advised that their cholesterol level is "desirable" when their true level warrants further action To what extent does blood cholesterol change in response to an intervention? In general, confidence intervals are too wide to allow decision making and patient feedback about an individual's cholesterol response to a dietary intervention, even with multiple measurements. If no change is observed in an individual's cholesterol value based on three measurements before and three after dietary intervention, the 80% confidence interval ranges from a true increase of 4% to a true decrease of 9%.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Monitoring Cholesterol Levels: Measurement Error or True Change?
Glasziou et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:656-661.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis
Peters et al.
JAMA 2006;295:676-680.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Monitoring in chronic disease: a rational approach
Glasziou et al.
BMJ 2005;330:644-648.
FULL TEXT  

Intraindividual variation in serum retinol concentrations among participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994
Gillespie et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004;79:625-632.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

'This added to my multiple myopia'
Irwig
BMJ 2003;326:1336-1336.
FULL TEXT  

Identification of Potential Predisposition to Clinical Atherosclerosis: A Clinical Concept Based on Integration of Significant Blood Parameters with Platelet Aggregation Scores
Kaplan et al.
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOST 1997;3:174-182.
ABSTRACT  

Relation of Glycohemoglobin and Adiposity to Atherosclerosis in Youth
McGill et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 1995;15:431-440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transcutaneous Oxygen Tension Measurement in Patients with Chronic Arterial Obstructive Disease: Reliability and Long-Term variability of the Method
Melillo et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1994;45:469-475.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.