You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 13, October 2, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Upper-Body Fat Distribution and Endometrial Cancer Risk

David V. Schapira, MBChB, FRCPC; Nagi B. Kumar, RD, MA; Gary H. Lyman, MD, MPH; Denis Cavanagh, MD; William S. Roberts, MD; James LaPolla, MD

JAMA. 1991;266(13):1808-1811.


Abstract

Study Objective.
—To determine if body fat distribution affected endometrial cancer risk.

Design.
—Case-control study.

Setting.
—This study was carried out at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center at the University of South Florida, Tampa, where all patients in the case group received their diagnoses and histological confirmations.

Patients.
—Forty consecutive women newly diagnosed with endometrial cancer and 40 controls matched for age and Quetelet index.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Anthropometric measurements were taken for the abdomen, thigh, suprailiac, subscapular, biceps, and triceps skin fold thicknesses; waist and hip circumferences, weight, and height. Relative risks for endometrial cancer were calculated according to these anthropometric measurements.

Results.
—Case patients with endometrial cancer had significantly greater waist-to-hip circumference ratios (P<.001), abdomen-to-thigh skin fold ratios (P<.01), and suprailiac-to-thigh skin fold ratios (P =.02) compared with control subjects matched for age and Quetelet index. The relative risk for endometrial cancer increased with an increasing waist-to-hip circumference ratio (≤1.14 = 1.0; >1.14 = 15.0), with an increasing abdomen-to-thigh skin fold ratio (≤0.82= 1.0; >0.82 = 5.0), and with an increasing suprailiac to-thigh skin fold thickness ratio (≤0.67 = 1.0; >0.67 = 3.50).

Conclusion.
— Upper-body fat localization is a significant risk factor for endometrial cancer in women matched for age and Quetelet index.

(JAMA. 1991;266:1808-1811)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Cancer Prevention, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 (Dr Schapira).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Body Mass and Endometrial Cancer Risk by Hormone Replacement Therapy and Cancer Subtype
McCullough et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:73-79.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Weight change and risk of endometrial cancer
Trentham-Dietz et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:151-158.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Adiposity and Fat Distribution on Endometrial Cancer Risk in Shanghai Women
Xu et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:939-947.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Weight, Health, and Culture: Shifting the Paradigm for Alternative Health Care
Robison
Complementary Health Practice Review 1999;5:45-69.
ABSTRACT  

Identification of Progesterone Receptor in Human Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue
O’Brien et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998;83:509-513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Body Fat Distribution and 5-Year Risk of Death in Older Women
Folsom et al.
JAMA 1993;269:483-487.
ABSTRACT  

UPPER-BODY FAT IS LINKED TO ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
JWatch General 1991;1991:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.