You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 13, October 2, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Brief Report
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bias Against Negative Studies in Newspaper Reports of Medical Research

Gideon Koren, MD; Naomi Klein

JAMA. 1991;266(13):1824-1826.


Abstract

Objective.
—To assess if the reporting of controversial medical journal articles by newspapers reflects the existence of a bias against negative studies (those showing no effect), we compared the rates of newspaper reporting of two studies, one negative and one positive, published back-to-back in the March 20, 1991, issue of JAMA. Both studies analyzed an area of public health concern, radiation as a risk for cancer.

Design.
—Seven computerized on-line databases were screened for daily newspapers published in North America during the week following JAMA's publication of the two studies. These databases had full-text access to 168 daily newspapers. Newspapers identified with reports of the two studies were analyzed for length and quality of the reports.

Results.
—Seventeen newspapers, publishing 19 reports on the two studies, were identified. Nine reports were dedicated solely to the positive study and 10 reports covered both studies. None of the reports were dedicated to the negative study only. In reports covering both studies, the mean length of the positive reports was significantly longer than the mean length of the negative reports (354±181 words vs 192±178 words; P=.04). The mean quality score of the positive reports was significantly higher than that of the negative reports (10.1 ±3.4 vs 5.9±4.9; P=.02).

Conclusions.
—The number, length, and quality of newspaper reports on the positive study were greater than news reports on the negative study, which suggests a bias against news reports of studies showing no effects or no adverse effects.

(JAMA. 1991;266:1824-1826)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Hospital for Sick Children, and the Department of Pediatrics and Pharmacology, the University of Toronto, Ontario. Dr Koren is a career scientist of the Ontario Ministry of Health.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1x8 (Dr Koren).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers
Bubela and Caulfield
CMAJ 2004;170:1399-1407.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Study of the Media's Potential Influence on Prospective Research Participants' Understanding of and Motivations for Participation in a High-Profile Phase I Trial
Pentz et al.
JCO 2002;20:3785-3791.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Newspaper Reporting of Screening Mammography
Wells et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:1029-1037.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Print media coverage of research on passive smoking
Kennedy and Bero
Tobacco Control 1999;8:254-260.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials
Ioannidis
JAMA 1998;279:281-286.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers
Entwistle
BMJ 1995;310:920-923.
FULL TEXT  

Arnoldisms: Medical Aphorisms of Capute of Hopkins
Accardo
CLIN PEDIATR 1994;33:444-448.
 

A National Survey of Public Health Officers' Interactions With the Media
Gellert et al.
JAMA 1994;271:1285-1289.
ABSTRACT  

Outcome after Maternal Varicella Infection in the First 20 Weeks of Pregnancy
Pastuszak et al.
NEJM 1994;330:901-905.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Green Politics
Weetman
Indoor and Built Environment 1992;1:261-262.
 

TV or Not TV Communicating Health Information to the Public
Dan
JAMA 1992;268:1026-1027.
ABSTRACT  

Is Successful Prevention Newsworthy?
Weetman
Indoor and Built Environment 1992;1:197-198.
 

Reporting Negative Studies in the Mass Media
Neus
JAMA 1992;267:930-930.
ABSTRACT  

Reporting Negative Studies in the Mass Media
Jablon and Boice
JAMA 1992;267:931-931.
ABSTRACT  

Reporting Negative Studies in the Mass Media
Bishop
JAMA 1992;267:930-930.
ABSTRACT  

Publication Bias: The Triumph of Hope Over Experience
Rennie and Flanagin
JAMA 1992;267:411-412.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.