You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 15, October 16, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Malpractice Claims Data as a Quality Improvement Tool

II. Is Targeting Effective?

John E. Rolph, PhD; Richard L. Kravitz, MD, MSPH; Kimberly McGuigan, MS

JAMA. 1991;266(15):2093-2097.


Abstract

Objective.
—To evaluate the usefulness of malpractice claims data for identifying (1) physicians who are prone to negligent errors and (2) physician and hospital characteristics associated with particular kinds of errors.

Design.
—Retrospective review of physician malpractice claim records.

Setting.
—Large New Jersey physician malpractice insurer.

Participants.
—Physicians practicing obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, anesthesiology, or radiology and covered by the insurance carrier for any portion of 1977 through 1989.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Claims were classified into 11 clinical error categories comprising three broad groups: patient management problems, technical performance problems, and staff coordination problems. Outcomes were expressed as per-physician frequency of claims due to negligence and proportion of claims associated with various types of errors.

Results.
—Using 5 years of claims history to predict long-term claims proneness was more accurate than chance alone by 57% in obstetrics and gynecology, 33% in general surgery, 11% in anesthesiology, and 15% in radiology. Cross-validated recursive partitioning showed that among physician characteristics, only specialty was predictive of physician error profiles. For physician claims arising in acute care hospitals, hospital size and location in addition to hospital services discriminated among different error profiles; the cross-validated accuracy of this method was 69% compared with 22% accuracy achieved by random prediction.

Conclusion.
—Use of physicians' malpractice claims histories to target individuals for education or sanctions is problematic because of the only modest predictive power of such claims histories.

(JAMA. 1991;266:2093-2097)



Author Affiliations

From the Health Program, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif (Drs Rolph and Kravitz and Ms McGuigan) and the Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Service Research, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles (Dr Kravitz).


Footnotes

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not represent those of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ, or The RAND Corporation.

Reprint requests to the Health Program, The RAND Corporation, 1700 Main St, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90406-2138 (Dr Rolph).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medical Malpractice and the Chest Physician
Luce
Chest 2008;134:1044-1050.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

No-Fault Compensation for Medical Injuries: The Prospect for Error Prevention
Studdert and Brennan
JAMA 2001;286:217-223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lawyers, litigation, and liability: Can they make patients safer?
Holloway and Panzer
Neurology 2001;56:991-993.
FULL TEXT  

Omission-Related Malpractice Claims and the Limits of Defensive Medicine
Kravitz et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1997;54:456-471.
ABSTRACT  

Physicians' Experience With Allegations of Medical Malpractice in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Meadow et al.
Pediatrics 1997;99:e10-e10.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician-Patient Communication: The Relationship With Malpractice Claims Among Primary Care Physicians and Surgeons
Levinson et al.
JAMA 1997;277:553-559.
ABSTRACT  

The Relationship Between Malpractice Claims History and Subsequent Obstetric Care
Entman et al.
JAMA 1994;272:1588-1591.
ABSTRACT  

The Relationship Between Physicians' Malpractice Claims History and Later Claims: Does the Past Predict the Future?
Bovbjerg and Petronis
JAMA 1994;272:1421-1426.
ABSTRACT  

Iatrogenic Complications in High-Risk, Elderly Patients
Lefevre et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:2074-2080.
ABSTRACT  

CAN STUDY OF MALPRACTICE CLAIMS LEAD TO BETTER CARE
JWatch General 1991;1991:8-8.
FULL TEXT  

Malpractice Claims Data as a Quality Improvement Tool: I. Epidemiology of Error in Four Specialties
Kravitz et al.
JAMA 1991;266:2087-2092.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.