You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 20, November 27, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Can Practice Guidelines Reduce the Number and Costs of Malpractice Claims?

Deborah W. Garnick, ScD; Ann M. Hendricks, PhD; Troyen A. Brennan, MPH, MD, JD

JAMA. 1991;266(20):2856-2860.


Abstract

Practice guidelines have the potential to reduce the number of malpractice cases and the costs of settling them. However, for practice guidelines to exert any influence, they must be assumed to be (1) developed for conditions or procedures that frequently lead to events for which negligence claims are filed; (2) widely accepted in the medical profession; (3) fully integrated into clinical practice; and (4) straightforward and readily interpreted in a litigation setting. Because the validity of each of these assumptions can be questioned, the idea that inserting practice guidelines into the existing litigation process will generate large savings in the near future is overly optimistic.

(JAMA. 1991;266:2856-2860)



Author Affiliations

From the Program on Health Care Financing and Insurance, Harvard School of Public Health (Drs Garnick and Hendricks) and the Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Dr Brennan), Boston, Mass.


Footnotes

Reprints not available



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A qualitative survey of staff responses to an integrated care pathway pilot study in a mental healthcare setting
Hall
Journal of Research in Nursing 2001;6:696-705.
ABSTRACT  

Pediatricians' Awareness of and Attitudes About Four Clinical Practice Guidelines
Christakis and Rivara
Pediatrics 1998;101:825-830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attributes of ATS documents that guide clinical practice. Recommendations of the ATS Clinical Practice Committee
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997;156:2015-2025.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines in Pediatric and Newborn Medicine: Implications for Their Use in Practice
Merritt et al.
Pediatrics 1997;99:100-114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Critical Pathways as a Strategy for Improving Care: Problems and Potential
Pearson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1995;123:941-948.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Four Proposals for Market-Based Health Care System Reform
Sumner
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:660-664.
ABSTRACT  

Practice Guidelines: A New Reality in Medicine: III. Impact on Patient Care
Woolf
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2646-2655.
ABSTRACT  

What Physicians Know
Tanenbaum
NEJM 1993;329:1268-1271.
FULL TEXT  

Can Practice Guidelines Reduce Malpractice Claims?
Goldschmidt
JAMA 1992;267:2602-2603.
ABSTRACT  

Should Practice Parameters Be the Standard of Care in Malpractice Litigation?
Hirshfeld
JAMA 1991;266:2886-2891.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.