You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 21, December 4, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Age-Based Rationing and Women

Nancy S. Jecker, PhD

JAMA. 1991;266(21):3012-3015.


Abstract

The expense of caring for growing numbers of older individuals can create strong incentives to ration health care based on age. While not directed explicitly at women, this form of rationing would affect women disproportionately because more women than men occupy the ranks of older Americans. A proper understanding of age-based rationing requires attention to gender issues. Once gender issues are taken into account, age-based rationing appears to perpetuate broader gender inequities in the society. This position is supported by three arguments. First, although age-based rationing leads to inequalities between age groups, the inequalities it produces between the sexes are more ethically troubling. Second, these departures from equality cannot be justified even when they benefit society at large by enabling investments in other health care priorities. Finally, since older women represent a disadvantaged and vulnerable group, age-based rationing is difficult to justify even if our obligation to protect the vulnerable is minimal.

(JAMA. 1991;266:3012-3015)



Author Affiliations

From the University of Washington, School of Medicine, Department of Medical History and Ethics, Seattle. This article was written when Dr Jecker was a Visiting Scholar at Stanford (Calif) University Institute for Research on Women and Gender and the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, Palo Alto, Calif.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the University of Washington, School of Medicine, Department of Medical History and Ethics, Mail Stop SB-20, Seattle, WA 98195 (Dr Jecker).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Representation of Elderly Persons and Women in Published Randomized Trials of Acute Coronary Syndromes
Lee et al.
JAMA 2001;286:708-713.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Access to Health Care for Older Women
JWatch Women's Health 1999;1999:21-21.
FULL TEXT  

Influence of Race, Sex, and Age on Management of Unstable Angina and Non--Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction: The TIMI III Registry
Stone et al.
JAMA 1996;275:1104-1112.
ABSTRACT  

Cardiovascular Health and Disease in Women
Wenger et al.
NEJM 1993;329:247-256.
FULL TEXT  

American Women's Health Care: A Patchwork Quilt With Gaps
Clancy and Massion
JAMA 1992;268:1918-1920.
ABSTRACT  

The Exclusion of the Elderly and Women From Clinical Trials in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Gurwitz et al.
JAMA 1992;268:1417-1422.
ABSTRACT  

Exclusion of the Elderly and Women From Coronary Trials: Is Their Quality of Care Compromised?
Wenger
JAMA 1992;268:1460-1461.
ABSTRACT  

Age-Based Rationing and Women
Diekema
JAMA 1992;267:1612-1612.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.