You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 5, August 7, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Recognition and Control of Occupational Disease

Philip J. Landrigan, MD, MSc; Dean B. Baker, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1991;266(5):676-680.


Abstract

Occupational diseases account each year in the United States for an estimated 50 000 to 70 000 deaths and 350 000 new cases of illness. Often, however, occupational diseases are not correctly diagnosed, because they mimic diseases due to other causes and because most physicians are not well trained in their recognition. Opportunities for prevention and treatment are therefore lost. The occupational history is the most effective means for proper diagnosis of occupational illness. It should routinely be obtained for every patient. A brief but systematic guide for obtaining an occupational history is presented in this report. Also, approaches are summarized for the recognition and diagnosis of such important occupational diseases as occupational cancer, asbestosis and other respiratory disorders, and occupational neuropsychologic disorders. The management and prevention of occupational diseases depend on reduction of hazardous exposures in the workplace and better education of workers, industrial managers, and physicians. This report outlines a program for the control of occupational disease based on (1) preventing exposures in the workplace, (2) premarket toxicity testing of new chemicals and technologies, and (3) astute clinical diagnosis.

(JAMA. 1991;266:676-680)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Community Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Community Medicine, Box 1057, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 (Dr Landrigan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Occupational History Quality in Patients With Newly Documented, Clinician-Diagnosed Chronic Bronchitis
Kuschner et al.
Chest 2009;135:378-383.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of occupational history assessments in working age adults with newly diagnosed asthma.
Shofer et al.
Chest 2006;130:455-462.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Occupational Injury and Illness Surveillance: Conceptual Filters Explain Underreporting
Azaroff et al.
AJPH 2002;92:1421-1429.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Association Between Occupation and Asthma in General Medical Practice
Blanc et al.
Chest 1999;115:1259-1264.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Occupational Illness
Newman
NEJM 1995;333:1128-1134.
FULL TEXT  

Deaths From Asbestos: One Physician's Practice
Jackson
JAMA 1992;268:2169-2169.
ABSTRACT  

Expanding the Boundaries of Medicine: Targeting a Common Enemy
Foege
JAMA 1991;266:702-702.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.