You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 9, September 4, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

National Medical Response to Mass Disasters in the United States

Are We Prepared?

Ernesto A. Pretto, Jr, MD; Peter Safar, MD

JAMA. 1991;266(9):1259-1262.


Abstract

Preparing for a resuscitation response to mass disasters, such as major earthquakes or industrial disasters, requires revisions of present local, regional, and national disaster plans. These should include the following: (1) life-supporting first aid and basic rescue capability of the lay public; (2) advanced trauma life support and advanced (heavy) rescue capability brought quickly to the scene from local and surrounding (regional) emergency medical services systems; and (3) trauma hospitals sending medical resuscitation teams to, and receiving casualties from, the disaster scene for resuscitative surgery and definitive care. Local and regional everyday emergency medical services systems would respond first. The armed forces should help, at least for transport and security. We propose that the National Disaster Medical System replace its civil defense model with an emergency medical services model, designed to mobilize rapid support for local emergency medical services systems from regional, state, and national resources. Coordination should be by one federal agency, such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which, however, needs to focus more on resuscitation through physician input.

(JAMA. 1991;266:1259-1262)



Author Affiliations

From the International Resuscitation Research Center (Disaster Reanimatology Study Group), the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Presbyterian University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh (Pa) School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Presented in part at the Sixth Congress of the World Association for Emergency and Disaster Medicine (Club of Mainz), Hong Kong, September 12, 1989.

Reprint requests to University of Pittsburgh, International Resuscitation Research Center, 3434 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 (Dr Pretto).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medical Response after an Earthquake
Bessman et al.
NEJM 1996;334:1746-1747.
FULL TEXT  

Physicians and Disaster Preparedness
Kingston
JAMA 1992;267:655-655.
ABSTRACT  

Physicians and Disaster Preparedness
Mason
JAMA 1992;267:654-655.
ABSTRACT  

Status of a National Disaster Medical Response
Roth
JAMA 1991;266:1266-1266.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.